Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.
10-15 May 2021
Virtual Event
Europe/Vienna timezone
The Conference will be held virtually from 10-15 May 2021

Overview of the results from the divertor experiments at Wendelstein 7-X and their implications for steady state operation

14 May 2021, 17:18
17m
Virtual Event

Virtual Event

Regular Oral Magnetic Fusion Experiments EX/7 Divertor and SOL

Speaker

Marcin Jakubowski (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik)

Description

A fusion reactor based on a stellarator design has the advantage of an easier access to long pulse scenarios. In fact, one of the main goals of Wendelstein 7-X (W7-X), the largest advanced stellarator in the world, is to demonstrate the steady-state capabilities of the stellarator line. From 2022 onward, all plasma-facing components will be water-cooled, which should enable pulse duration of up to 30 minutes with up to 10 MW of ECRH input power. Therefore, in the recent campaign [1,2] a number of experiments were performed in order to prepare long pulse operation, addressing issues like the development of stable detachment, control of the heat and particle exhaust and the influence of leading edges on plasma performance. We have shown that an island divertor is a good concept for steady state heat and particle exhaust. A highlight of the recent campaign was a robust detachment scenario, which allowed removing power loads due to direct contact of divertor target plates with the plasma, while reaching neutral pressures at the pumping gap entrance yielded the particle removal rate close to the values required for stable density control in steady state operation.
The heat and particle exhaust in W7-X is realized with help of an island divertor [1], which utilizes large magnetic islands at the plasma boundary. In the so-called “standard configuration” with $n/m$ = 5/5 islands at the boundary attached plasmas showed very efficient heat flux spreading and favorable scaling with input power.
Peak heat flux as a function of heating power and central density. Solid line indicates upper radiation stability limit at W7-X, the dashed one lower limit due to too high divertor power loads

In Figure 1 an overview of peak heat loads to all 10 divertors is shown. At a given input power, there is a plasma density range which yields divertor heat flux below allowed 10 MW/m$^2$. For attached plasmas with $P_{\rm ECRH}\leq6$ MW, $q_{\rm max}$ was typically in the range of 4 to 6 MW/m$^2$, which, when extrapolated to 10 MW of input power, provides a safe operational range at line integrated plasma densities above $5∙10^{19}$m$^{-2}$.

Evolution of heat flux during transition to detachment. (left) Time trace of peak heat flux; (right) snapshot of averaged heat flux distribution at $t = 2$ s and $t = 20$ s.

Increasing ne leads to increasing plasma radiation and at radiation fractions $f_{\rm rad}>0.8$ to complete plasma detachment. The detachment regime led to a significant reduction of the divertor heat and particle fluxes. An example of a 30 second discharge [3] with peak heat flux reduced by factor of 9 is shown in Figure 2. Although a significant local up-down asymmetry due to edge drifts [4] is observed in the attached state at $t$ < 3 s, it vanishes when transitioning into detachment. In the downstream (near-target) region of the SOL, Langmuir probes show a drop of the electron temperature from ca. 30 eV to ca. 5 e V. Additionally, Coherent Imaging Spectroscopy shows that during detachment the parallel flow velocity of C2+ in the scrape-off layer is significantly reduced [5].
Before the onset of detachment, the values of the downstream electron density are significantly higher ($1.2-1.4\cdot 10^{20}$ m$^{-3}$) than electron densities near the separatrix (ne,sep is in the range $4-6\cdot 10^{19}$ m$^{-3}$. This difference between upstream and downstream density indicates that the divertor operates in the high recycling regime. This detachment regime is characterized by low impurity concentration ($Z_{\rm eff} = 1.5$) and high neutral pressure ($p_n \leq $ 0.1 Pa) in the subdivertor volume. Estimates of total pumping rate for detached discharges at ca. 0.6$\cdot 10^{21}$ [atoms/s] show that at these neutral pressures particle exhaust is at the level required for steady-state operation. As the radiation characteristics of carbon is similar to that of nitrogen, the results obtained here should to a large extent be valid for detachment driven by nitrogen seeding [6] . In steady state W7-X will operate with continuous pellet fueling, therefore also several discharges were performed to see if it is possible achieve stable detached scenarios with plasma density stabilized with low frequency pellet injection.

Time traces for W7-X #201801010.040 with 2 Hz pellet injection. From top to bottom: (1) ECRH input power, (2) total divertor loads (Pdiv) and total radiated power (Prad), peak heat loads to upper (AEF20) and lower (AEF51) divertor, (4) diamagnetic energy (Wdia), (4) line integrated density, (5) plasma effective charge (Zeff), (6) neutral pressure at the pumping gap.

An example of such a discharge is presented in Figure 3, where peak heat flux is reduced from ca. 5 MW/m$^2$ to ca. 2 MW/m$^2$, neutral pressure at the pumping gap is kept at 0.06 Pa and Zeff stays at the level of ca. 1.2.
As W7-X is a low shear device, edge islands are sensitive to changes in toroidal current [7]. Several measures to counteract strike-line movements induced by the plasma current evolution were tested, e.g. by use of external coils or ECCD. An essential issue of long pulse operation is impurity control. A series of experiments were performed to study the behavior of intrinsic impurities as well as seeding low and highly recycling species to enhance plasma radiation. Overall W7-X shows good impurity control in low and high density discharges with Te/Ti > 1. We have found that despite high influx of carbon into the SOL during discharges with dedicated overloading of the leading edges, the plasmas remained stable. Line-of-sight averaged Zeff stayed below 1.5 throughout the discharge and radiation increased at the plasma edge only.
The results presented in this work form a promising outlook on the overall steady state compatibility of the detached island divertor concept in future experiments and a stellarator-based reactor.

[1] T. S. Pedersen et al., Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 61, 014035 (2019).
[2] R. C. Wolf et al., Phys Plasmas 26 (2019).
[3] M. Jakubowski et al., Physical Review Letters (submitted).
[4] K. C. Hammond et al., Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 61, 125001 (2019).
[5] V. Perseo et al., in IAEA-FECNice, France, 2020).
[6] F. Effenberg et al., Nuclear Fusion 59 (2019).
[7] Y. Gao et al., Nuclear Fusion 59 (2019).

Country or International Organization Germany
Affiliation Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik

Primary authors

Marcin Jakubowski (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Andreas Dinklage (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Dr Michael Endler (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Dr Yuhe Feng (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, 17491 Greifswald, Germany) Dr Yu Gao (Max-Planck Institut für Plasmaphysik) Golo Fuchert (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Greifswald, Germany) Ralf Koenig (Max-Planck-Institut for Plasma Physics) Dr Thierry Kremeyer (University of Wisconsin - Madison) Dr Maciej Krychowiak (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Dr Matthias Otte (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Dr Holger Niemann (Max-Planck Institut für Plasmaphysik) Mrs Valeria Perseo (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Dr Victoria Winters (Max-Planck-Institut - IEK-4) Dr Felix Reimold (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Mr Lukas Rudischhauser (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Mr Georg Schlisio (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Oliver Schmitz (University of Wisconsin - Madison, Department of Engineering Physics) Thomas Sunn Pedersen (Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics)

Co-authors

Sebastijan Brezinsek (Forschungszentrum Jülich) Dr Rainer Burhenn (Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics) Dr Peter Drewelow (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Philipp Drews (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, Partner of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC)) Dr Florian Effenberg (Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, 08543 USA) Dr Kenneth Hammond (Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory) Carsten Killer (Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics, Greifswald, Germany) Alexander Knieps (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH) Jeremy Lore (ORNL) Dr Aleix Puig Sitjes (Max-Planck Institut für Plasmaphysik) Erhui Wang (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH) Dr Uwe Wenzel (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Glen Wurden (LANL) Dr Daihong Zhang (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik Greifswald)

Presentation Materials