Since 18 of December 2019 uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.
10-15 May 2021
Nice, France
Europe/Vienna timezone
The Conference will be held virtually from 10-15 May 2021

Net parallel carbon rotation in the core of the Wendelstein 7-X stellarator: a deviation from neoclassical predictions?

13 May 2021, 14:00
4h 45m
Nice, France

Nice, France

Regular Poster Magnetic Fusion Experiments P6 Posters 6


Dr Arturo Alonso (Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión, CIEMAT)


Plasmas flows have been extensively studied in magnetic confinement fusion and found to be critical to edge transport barriers and global MHD stability. In non-symmetric systems, the flow-defining radial electric field and net parallel rotation are expected to be set by neoclassical mechanisms and are related to the radial particle transport and parallel bootstrap current. In this respect, the experimental verification of the flow predictions provide a fundamental sanity check for the accuracy of the neoclassical description of transport processes in a device, Wendelstein 7-X, which was optimised on the basis of that description. Generally speaking, the neoclassical ambipolar electric field is known to provide a good qualitative description of the measured values in stellarator devices. Nevertheless, previous validation efforts have shown measurable quantitative deviations (Dinklage et al. 2013) and accounts of 'spontaneous toroidal flow' have been published in the scientific literature (Nagaoka et al. 2013).

In this contribution we present a first comparison of fully-stripped carbon flows with neoclassical expectations obtained by the inversion of the multi-chord charge exchange recombination spectroscopy (CXRS) measurements (Ford et al. 2020) (see figure 1). The intricate magnetic configuration of the W7-X device requires a careful treatment of the flow geometry, including perperpendicular, Pfirsch-Schlütter and net parallel flow components for the interpretation of the velocity measurements and the inversion of the flow-defining flux surface quantities; namely the radial electric field ($E_r$) and the net parallel flow ($\langle V_\|B\rangle$). Additionally, the beam energy and main ion temperature in the device require to correct the measurements for cross-section effects.

Top: Inverted radial electric field and net parallel rotation profiles from CXRS data averaged over seven 20 ms long NBI blips during a 4 s long stable phase of the discharge 20180920.009. The yellow lines correspond to neoclassical DKES calculations. The dotted line shows the variation associated with a $Z_\textrm{eff} = 1.5\pm0.3$, whereas the error bar at $\rho=0.7$ show the variation due to a $\pm20\%$ variation of the local radial gradients of $n, T_e$ and $T_i$. Blue error bars reflect the uncertainty in the minimisation procedure and the gray error bar shows the typical error due the fitting of the spectral line. Bottom: comparison of the CXRS measured velocities to those forward-modelled from the profiles shown in the top figure. A global velocity offset due to the instrumental spectral drift is also obtained from the minimisation procedure. The primary energy of the beam and the beam composition used for the cross-section corrections are shown above the central plot.

As the representative case shown in figure 1 illustrates, both the experimental $E_r$ and $\langle{V_\|B\rangle}$ profiles agree in sign and order of magnitude with the neoclassical expectations. Furthermore, the reduction of the $E_r>0$ electron root feature with increasing density is shown to be captured by the measurements (not shown in the figure). Nevertheless, some differences with respect to the neoclassical profiles are systematically observed to be above the estimated errors. Most noticeably, the $E_r$ measured at around $70\%$ of the minor plasma radius is up to $2\times$ more negative than calculated, whereas a finite $\sim 2$km/s net parallel rotation is observed at the center, where simulations would predict no rotation.

We will present a systematic analysis of these flow deviations to establish the nature (physical or instrumental) of the discrepancies. Namely: (1) atomic-physics corrections will be further sophisticated to include the effects of the excited neutral beam and halo populations, (2) the possible effect of NBI momentum input and fast ion radial currents in the $E_r$ and parallel rotation deviations will be quantified and (3) parametric dependencies of the deviations will be assessed. Additionally, the radial electric field obtained from CXRS will be compared with reflectometry and X-ray imaging measurements. With this integral approach we aim to establish the possibility that the observations reflect the existence of substantial anomalous radial current and/or parallel momentum fluxes in W7-X.

A. Dinklage et al., Nucl. Fusion 53 063022 (2013)
K. Nagaoka et al., Phys. Plasmas 20, 056116 (2013)
O. Ford et al., Rev. Sci. Instruments, 91, 023507 (2020)

Affiliation Laboratorio Nacional de Fusion, CIEMAT
Country or International Organization Spain

Primary authors

Dr Arturo Alonso (Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión, CIEMAT) Dr Oliver Ford (Max-Planck Institut für Plasmaphysik) Ms Lila Vanó (Max Planck Institut für Plasmaphysik)


Dr Simppa Äkäslompolo (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Teilinstitut Greifswald) Dr Daniel Carralero (CIEMAT) Ivan Calvo (Laboratorio Nacional de Fusion, CIEMAT) Andreas Dinklage (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Teresa Estrada (CIEMAT) Andreas Langenberg (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik,17491 Greifswald, Germany) Samuel Lazerson (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Rachael McDermott (Max Planck Institut für Plasmaphysik) Novimir Pablant (Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory) Peter Poloskei (Max-Planck Institut für Plasmaphysik) Dr Håkan Smith (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Dr José Luis Velasco (Laboratorio Nacional de Fusion, CIEMAT) Thomas Windisch (Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics, Greifswald, Germany)

Presentation Materials

There are no materials yet.