Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.
10-15 May 2021
Virtual Event
Europe/Vienna timezone
The Conference will be held virtually from 10-15 May 2021

Neutronics Effect Study of Homogeneous Model on Solid Breeder Blanket

13 May 2021, 08:30
4h
Virtual Event

Virtual Event

Regular Poster Fusion Energy Technology P5 Posters 5

Speaker

Mr Shen QU (Southwestern Institute of Physics)

Description

Nuclear performance evaluation is the core basis of tritium breeding blanket design and also the key input for thermo-hydraulic and thermo-mechanic numerical analysis. Whereas, the tritium breeding blankets have the features of complex structure, heterogeneous neutron flux distribution and a long energy span of neutron, which are considerable challenges for neutronienter image description herecs modeling and transport calculation. Normally the homogeneous blanket models, especially for the pebble bed of tritium breeder and neutron multiplier, are used in worldwide for the neutronics calculation, however, the accuracy and applicability of this method need to be assessed considering the heterogeneous configuration of blanket. Referring to the blanket design of China Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR), the homogeneous model and high-fidelity model for neutronics calculation have been built. The neutronics effect of the homogeneous structure and the space self-shielding effect of pebble beds are studied separately considering two different types of coolant, helium and water. The calculation deviation of the homogenous model comparing with the high-fidelity model is obtained, which will provide strong support for neutronics design and optimization of tritium breeding blankets, such as Chinese ITER helium cooled ceramic breeder test blanket module (HCCB TBM) and CFETR blanket.
Neutronics models of solid breeder blanket.
Firstly, the homogenous neutronics model (homogeneous both in structure and pebble beds, Model A), half homogeneous neutronics model (homogenous only in pebble beds, Model B) and high-fidelity neutronics model (heterogenous, Model C) are performed by using the McCAD code individually. In the homogeneous model, different materials of the breeding blanket are mixed together according to their volume weights in each functional region. The reflecting boundaries are applied in these three models, including both toroidal and poloidal directions. Significantly, a packing fraction of 52.36% (simple cubic packing) in both the Li4SiO4 and Be pebble beds is assumed. A general neutron source is adopted and it is a Gaussian fusion energy spectrum which is added in the front of the first wall (FW). ODS steel is selected as the structure material, and Li4SiO4 as the breeding breeder in the pebble bed regions and Be is utilized as the neutron multiplier.
Simplified models of solid breeder blanket.
Secondly, Model A and B are considered for studying the neutronics effect of homogeneous structure on the solid breeder blanket. The MCNP code is applied for the 3D neutronics transport calculation for the solid breeder blanket, and FENDL2.1 is used. Nuclear performance evaluation, including the TBR (Tritium Breeding Ratio), neutron flux and neutron energy spectrum of each tritium breeding region is performed. Also, the neutron mean-free paths of Li in each tritium breeder regions are calculated. The results indicate that the homogeneous structure has small impacts (~0.30% TBR overestimation from 1.2162 to 1.2194) on the performance of the helium-cooled blanket concept, but makes the TBR overestimated by ~2.48% (from 1.0173 to 1.0425) in the water-cooled blanket concept due to the moderation of water towards neutrons.
Thirdly, the diameter of the pellet is assumed to be 0.8-1.2mm and there are more than one hundred million (~1E8) pellets in a single solid breeder blanket module and the MCNP input file will exceed ~3GB , which demands a huge amount of computer memories making it difficult to get solution. Therefore, two simplified models, Model D1 (homogeneous in structure, but real structure for pebbles) and Model D2 (homogeneous both in structure and pebble beds), are adopted. The space self-shielding effect is assessed in Model C and Model D1 with pellets of 1cm in diameter individually. Results show that the TBR overestimations are ~0.33% and ~0.30% in helium-cooled concept and ~4.02% and ~3.78% in water-cooled concept separately, which indicates that these two results are in good coincidence with each other. Therefore, simplified models are verified to be rational for performing space self-shielding neutronics analysis with pellets of real size.
Finally, nuclear performance evaluation with pellets of real size is performed and results indicate that the space self-shielding effect caused by the pebble beds has little influence on the neutronics performance if it is helium-cooled, yet ~1.28% overestimation for the TBR if it is water-cooled with 1mm diameter pellets. Based on Model D1, the TBR vs the diameter of pellets is also studied which implies that the overestimation could be omitted if the pellet diameter gets smaller to ~0.1mm for water-cooled blanket concept.
In conclusion, the homogeneous model is rational for neutronic analyses if the coolant is helium. Yet, there is non-negligible overestimation for the TBR of water-cooled blanket concept with more than 1mm diameter pellets, and high-fidelity model should be adopted during the neutronics transport calculation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The work at SWIP (Southwestern Institute of Physics) was supported under National Natural Science Foundation of China Number 11905046 and National Key R&D Program of China Number 2017YFE0300503 and 2017YFE0300601. Also acknowledge to the KIT (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) for the development of McCAD code.
REFERENCES
1. Y. X. WAN, J. G. LI, Y. LIU, X. WANG, V. CHAN, C. CHEN, “Overview of the Present Progress and Activities on the CFETR.” Nuclear Fusion 57.10(2017):102009.
2. G. ZHUANG, G. Q. LI, J. G. LI, Y. X. WAN, Y. LIU, X. WANG, “Progress of the CFETR Design.” Nuclear Fusion (2019).
3. X. Y. WANG, K. M. FENG, Y. J. CHEN, L. ZHANG, Y. FENG, X. H. WU, “Current Design and R&D Progress of CN HCCB TBS.” Nuclear Fusion (2019).
4. X. Y. WANG, Development Status of Helium Cooled Ceramic Breeder Tritium Breeding Blanket (HCCB TBB) in China [R], Budapest Hungary, 2019.*

Affiliation Southwestern Institute of Physics
Country or International Organization China

Primary author

Mr Shen QU (Southwestern Institute of Physics)

Co-authors

Mr Qixiang CAO (Southwestern Institute of Physics) Prof. Xuru DUAN (Southwestern Institute of Physics) Prof. Xueren WANG (Fusion Power System) Prof. Zaixin LI (Southwestern Institute of Physics) Prof. Xiaoyu WANG (Southwestern Institute of Physics)

Presentation Materials