Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.
10-15 May 2021
Nice, France
Europe/Vienna timezone
The Conference will be held virtually from 10-15 May 2021

Global Forces on Tokamak Wall during Disruptions

12 May 2021, 08:30
4h
Nice, France

Nice, France

Regular Poster Magnetic Fusion Theory and Modelling P3 Posters 3

Speaker

Vadim Yanovskiy (Institute of Plasma Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences)

Description

To verify the CarMa0NL modelling for COMPASS-U, the numerical results are cross-validated with general analytical predictions [Pustovitov V. D., Nuclear Fusion 55 113032 (2015)]: the computed vertical force on the tokamak wall is found to be almost zero during fast transients, as it should be. This test proves the credibility of the model and computational method. The role of poloidal eddy current (which is absent in some approaches) in the dynamics of radial force on vacuum chamber is found to be essential. This justifies the choice of CarMa0NL, which additionally is able to describe real 3D geometry of the conducting structures, as a primary tool for disruption studies for COMPASS-U.

Strong electromagnetic loads on tokamak vacuum vessel and in-vessel components ('wall') caused by an abrupt termination of plasma discharge must be modelled thoroughly to guarantee structural integrity of future fusion reactors. In the absence of a predictive theory for plasma behavior during disruptions, the design of tokamak chambers still remains a challenging task. Recently some general rules [1] have been established in theory that allow to test the credibility of modelling. The present study aims to verify these rules numerically for the wall configuration with passive stabilizing plates (PSPs) to complement the similar analysis performed for the wall without PSPs [2].

Many tokamaks, specifically AUG, COMPASS-U, DTT, EAST, JT-60SA, KSTAR and WEST employ PSPs to improve vertical stability of elongated plasmas. Hereinafter, we scrutinize the COMPASS-U, which is a high-field tokamak presently in the final design phase. It will operate at the toroidal magnetic field, plasma current and elongation up to $B=5\ T$, $I=2\ MA$ and $\kappa = 1.8$, respectively. The upper (UP) and lower plate (LP) are placed inside the vacuum vessel (VV) as shown in Fig. 1 (a). The resistive decay time for toroidal current induced in these copper PSPs is $\tau_{psp}=66~ms$, which is 22 times larger than the same value for VV made of Inconel ($\tau_{vv}^{tor}=3~ms$). This complicates electromagnetic and mechanical analysis of the wall response. We study a number of different disruption scenarios with CarMa0NL [3] to understand the dynamics of electromagnetic loads on the wall. Preliminary results presented in Fig. 1 confirm analytical predictions [1] for the COMPASS-U setup with PSPs: the total vertical force on the wall is zero for fast transients.

We analyse the fastest event one can expect on COMPASS-U: a linear 0.1 ms long TQ, as shown in Fig. 1 (k), is followed by a 3.3 MA/ms CQ (f). The safety factor $q_{95}$ first rises because of the current decay, but then, upward motion shrinks plasma cross-section and drops $q_{95}$ down to 1 (n). At this point we trigger a 0.01 ms CQ that terminates plasma. The above 2 MA CQ induces strong vertical forces on the vessel, $F_{vv}^z$, upper, $F_{up}^z$, and lower plate, $F_{lp}^z$, but the total vertical force on the wall (VV+PSPs), $F_\Sigma^z$, remains almost zero (h). The maximum of $\mid F_\Sigma^z \mid$ is reached in $\Delta t \approx \tau_{vv}^{tor}$ after the end of CQ. The same constant $\tau_{vv}^{tor}$ characterizes the grows of $F_{up}^z$ and $F_{lp}^z$ in Fig. 1 (d). While not yet predicted by analytics, also the minimum of radial force on vessel is delayed by $\Delta t \approx\tau_{vv}^{tor}$. We conclude that for fast ($<<\tau_{vv}^{tor}$) transients, $F_\Sigma^z\approx0$ at $t<<\tau_{vv}^{tor}$.

Until now, the largest forces on the COMPASS-U wall have been found for slow vertical displacement events (VDEs), such as shown in Fig. 2. However, to increase the credibility of numerical predictions we cross-validate our results with analytics [1] for the limit case of fast transients.

References:
[1] Pustovitov, V. D., Nucl. Fusion55, 113032 (2015).
[2] Pustovitov, V. D., Rubinacci, G. & Villone, F.Nucl. Fusion57, 126038 (2017).
[3] Villone, F., Barbato, L., Mastrostefano, S. & Ventre, S.Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion55, 095008 (2013).

Dynamics of plasma and wall parameters for a TQ followed by a CQ and a fast VDE.
Dynamics of plasma and wall parameters for a slow VDE followed by a TQ and a CQ.

Country or International Organization Czech Republic
Affiliation Institute of Plasma Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences

Primary author

Vadim Yanovskiy (Institute of Plasma Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences)

Co-authors

Mr N. Isernia (Consorzio CREATE, DIETI) Vladimir Pustovitov (National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute) Mr Valentino Scalera (Consorzio CREATE) Prof. F. Villone (Consorzio CREATE, DIETI) Mr Jakub Hromadka (IPP Prague) Mr Martin Imrisek (IPP CAS) Dr Josef Havlicek (IPP CAS) Dr Martin Hron (IPP CAS) Dr Radomir Panek (IPP CAS)

Presentation Materials

There are no materials yet.