Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

8–13 Oct 2012
US/Pacific timezone

TH/3-1: Impact of Carbon and Tungsten as Divertor Materials on the Scrape-off Layer Conditions in JET

10 Oct 2012, 14:40
20m
Oral Presentation THD - Magnetic Confinement Theory and Modelling: Plasma–material interactions; divertors, limiters, scrape-off layer (SOL) Plasma-Wall Interactions

Speaker

Mr Mathias Groth (Finland)

Description

In detached divertor conditions, a five-fold stronger reduction of the ion current to the low-field side target plate and a 30% increase in the density limit were observed in neutral-beam heated, low-confinement mode plasmas with the ITER-like Wall compared to the previous carbon wall. These significant differences occurred at higher core densities despite the fact that nearly identical scrape-off layer parameters were measured in attached divertor conditions. When attached, the magnitude and distribution of radiative power as well as the total ion currents to the divertor target plates were measured the same for a range of divertor plasma geometries, including configurations with the high field side strike point on the vertical plate and the low field side strike point on the horizontal plate, and configurations with both strike points on the vertical plates. The 5-to-10-fold reduction of the scrape-off layer carbon content as inferred from low charge state carbon emission, and the fact that both beryllium and tungsten have a low radiation potential in the scrape-off layer, would indicate that the deuterium emission was and still is the dominating radiator. Simulations of deuterium gas fuelling scans with the fluid edge code EDGE2/EIRENE show that replacing carbon with beryllium and tungsten as wall materials leads to reduced impurity radiation, as expected, and translates into an increase in the power conducted to the plates. The ion currents to the plates, however, are predicted to be similar in both materials configurations. Saturation of the ion currents is predicted at the highest achievable density; the simulations do not predict the reduction of the currents close to the density limit as observed in the experiments. Since the JET ITER-like wall constitutes the same materials and their poloidal distribution as foreseen for the nuclear phase of ITER, understanding the observed differences in the SOL conditions between the two materials configuration, and clarifying the discrepancy between the experimental data and simulations are instrumental for erosion and power handling in ITER.

Collaboration (if applicable, e.g., International Tokamak Physics Activities)

EFDA-JET

Country or International Organization of Primary Author

Finland

Primary author

Mr Mathias Groth (Finland)

Co-authors

Dr Alexander Huber (Institute of Energy and Climate Research, EURATOM association, Jülich, Germany) Dr Andrew Meigs (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Association EURATOM-CCFE, Abingdon, UK) Dr Antoine Sirinelli (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Association EURATOM-CCFE, Abingdon, UK) Mr Bernard Sieglin (Max-Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, EURATOM association, Garching, Germany) Dr Carine Giroud (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Association EURATOM-CCFE, Abingdon, UK) Dr Carlos Silva (Institute of Plasmas and Nuclear Fusion, Association EURATOM/IST, Lisbon, Portugal) Dr Christopher Lowry (EFDA Close Support Unit, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, UK) Dr Costanza F Maggi (Max-Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, EURATOM association, Garching, Germany) Dr Derek Harting (Institute of Energy and Climate Research, EURATOM association, Jülich, Germany) Dr Gennadi Sergienko (Institute of Energy and Climate Research, EURATOM association, Jülich, Germany) Dr Gerard Corrigan (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Association EURATOM-CCFE, Abingdon, UK) Dr Gerard J van Rooij (DIFFER, Association EURATOM-FOM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands) Dr Jan W Coenen (Institute of Energy and Climate Research, EURATOM association, Jülich, Germany) Dr Joanne Flanagan (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Association EURATOM-CCFE, Abingdon, UK) Dr Marc N A Beurskens (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Association EURATOM-CCFE, Abingdon, UK) Dr Mathias Brix (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Association EURATOM-CCFE, Abingdon, UK) Dr Meike Clever (Institute of Energy and Climate Research, EURATOM association, Jülich, Germany) Dr Michael F Stamp (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, Association EURATOM-CCFE, Abingdon, UK) Dr Michael Lehnen (Institute of Energy and Climate Research, EURATOM association, Jülich, Germany) Dr Paula da Silva Aresta Belo (Institute of Plasmas and Nuclear Fusion, Association EURATOM/IST, Lisbon, Portugal) Dr Sebastijan Brezinsek (Institute of Energy and Climate Research, EURATOM association, Jülich, Germany) Dr Stefan Jachmich (Association “EURATOM Belgium State”, Laboratory for Plasma Physics, Brussels, Belgium) Dr Stefan Marsen (Max-Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, EURATOM association, Greifswald, Germany) Dr Sven Wiesen (Institute of Energy and Climate Research, EURATOM association, Jülich, Germany) Dr Thomas Eich (Max-Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, EURATOM association, Garching, Germany)

Presentation materials