Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

5–8 Nov 2018
Vienna International Centre
CET timezone

The Gen-IV Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection methodology applied to GEN IV system designs: some reflections

Not scheduled
5m
M Building (Vienna International Centre)

M Building

Vienna International Centre

Wedge Participant Preparing for safeguards new facilities, processes and campaigns (NEW) [NEW] The Safeguards Challenges of New and Advanced Reactors

Speaker

Dr Giacomo G.M. Cojazzi (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate G - Nuclear Safety and Security)

Description

The Generation Four International Forum (GIF) formed a proliferation resistance and physical protection (PR&PP;) Working Group (PRPPWG) to develop a methodology to evaluate the six GIF nuclear energy systems concepts.
The PRPPWG developed the methodology through a series of development and demonstration case studies, using a hypothetical “Example Sodium Fast Reactor” (ESFR). The ESFR assessment allowed to test the full methodology on a complete nuclear energy system and many insights were gained from the process.
The PRPPWG and representatives of the GIF System Steering Committees (SSCs) for each of the six GIF design concepts analyzed the PR&PP; aspects of the six designs concepts. The outcome of this activity is documented in a joint PRPPWG and SSCs report made publicly available in 2011, highlighting the analysis performed and its main outcomes.
Currently the PRPPWG and the six GIF SSCs are in the process of repeating the exercise based on current status of the six GIF system design concepts, taking into account the designs evolution since 2011.
In line with Safeguards by Design, while during the first exercise the level of detail of the design options enabled only a high-level evaluation of the systems’ proliferation resistance, the early design stage allowed designers to introduce modifications for improving the system’s performance. With the designs’ current level of detail, the room for proposing modifications diminishes but increases the potential to inform the safeguards R&D; community on potential R&D; needs to fill potential safeguardability issues.
The paper will first summarize the main concepts behind the PR&PP; evaluation methodology. It will then summarize the main outcomes and lessons learned as in the current white papers on the PR aspects of the six GIF design concepts, and will finally describe the ongoing activity to update them.

Topics NEW1
Which "Key Question" does your Abstract address? NEW1.1

Primary authors

Mr David Henderson (OECD/NEA) Dr Giacomo G.M. Cojazzi (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate G - Nuclear Safety and Security) Dr Guido Renda (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate G - Nuclear Safety and Security) Prof. Per Peterson (University of California, Berkeley) Dr Robert Bari (Brookhaven National Laboratory)

Co-authors

Dr Alexander CHEBESKOV (State scientific Center of the Russian Federation - Institute for Physics and Power Engineering) Dr Benjamin Cipiti (Sandia National Laboratories) Dr Brian Boyer (International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)) Dr Eric Hervieu (French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)) Dr Franca Padoani (Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA)) Dr Geoffrey W. R. Edwards (Canadian Nuclear Laboratories) Dr Ho-Dong Kim (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI)) Mr Keiichiro Hori (Japan Atomic Energy Agency Vienna Office) Dr Kwan Kyoo Choe (Korea Institute for Nuclear Nonproliferation and Control(KINAC)) Dr Lap-Yan Cheng (Brookhaven National Laboratory)

Presentation materials