Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

8–13 Oct 2012
US/Pacific timezone

EX/P6-07: Electron Fishbones in LHCD Plasmas on FTU and Tore Supra

11 Oct 2012, 14:00
4h 45m
Poster Room (Area F-B)

Poster Room (Area F-B)

Poster EXW - Magnetic Confinement Experiments: Wave–plasma interactions; current drive; heating; energetic particles Poster: P6

Speaker

Mr Nicolas Dubuit (France)

Description

Usually, Electron driven fishbone modes are observed in Electron Cyclotron Resonant Heating (ECRH) plasmas[1,2]. The fast electrons produced by Lower Hybrid Current Drive (LHCD) systems often help destabilizing these modes when using a combination of ECRH and LHCD[2], but in most machines LHCD alone is unable to destabilize e fishbones[1,2]. However, in FTU and Tore Supra e-fishbones were recently observed in shots with LHCD only[3,4]. The evolutions of the mode radial position and frequency were determined from the ECE measurements using the procedure presented in[5]. In a second step, the energy of the resonant electrons was estimated based on the expression of the precession drift frequency[3]. In FTU, two regimes of e-fishbones (with and without bursts) can be obtained depending on the LH power[3], while in Tore Supra, only near stationary evolutions are observed. On the other hand, frequency jumps between modes with different mode wave numbers can be observed only in Tore Supra[4]. The relative trend of the mode frequency and position in FTU depends on the fishbone regime: the evolution in the regime without bursts is much slower than in the burst regime[6]. Moreover, the frequency evolution during the bursts is consistent with a nonadiabatic downward frequency chirping produced by mode particle pumping[6]. In Tore Supra, the mode position evolves continuously even during the frequency jumps. Moreover, the mode position evolution agrees with the q profile evolution and corresponds to an inverse cascade in mode wave numbers starting by an 4/4 mode and finishing in a 1/1. In both tokamaks, the energy of the resonant electrons was found to be close to the thermal energy if the pitch angle correction is neglected. Moreover, recent theoretical works[7] have shown that the passing electrons may also contribute to the drive of e fishbones. The dispersion relation in this case allows solutions with the mode frequency much lower than the precessional drift frequency[7], in agreement with these observations. [1] Wong K.L. 2000 Phys.Rev.Lett. 85 996 [2] Ding X.T. 2002 Nucl.Fusion 42 491 [3] Zonca F. 2007 Nucl.Fusion 47 1588. [4] Macor A. 2009 Phys.Rev.Lett. 102 155005 [5] Guimarães-Filho Z.O. 2011 Plasma Phys.Control.Fusion 53 074012 [6] Guimarães-Filho Z.O. 2012 submitted to Nucl.Fusion [7] Merle A. 2011, 12th IAEA TM on EP, P2.4, Austin (USA)

Country or International Organization of Primary Author

France

Primary author

Dr Zwinglio GUIMARAES FILHO (Aix Marseille Univ.)

Co-authors

Dr Angelo A. Tuccillo (ENEA) Mr Antoine Merle (CEA, IRFM) Dr Antonio Botrugno (ENEA) Dr Didier Elbeze (CEA, IRFM) Dr Fulvio Zonca (ENEA) Dr Gianluca Pucella (ENEA) Dr Giuseppe Calabrò (ENEA) Dr Joan Decker (CEA, IRFM) Mr Nicolas Dubuit (France) Dr Paolo Buratti (ENEA) Dr Patrick Maget (CEA, IRFM) Dr Roland Sabot (CEA, IRFM) Dr Sadruddin Benkadda (Aix Marseille Univ., PIIM) Dr Xavier Garbet (CEA, IRFM)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.