Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

28 November 2023 to 1 December 2023
IAEA Headquarters
Europe/Vienna timezone
Workshop programme now available

Predicting disruption in future tokamaks with fewer data by more physics-guided

29 Nov 2023, 13:10
1h 30m
Conference Room 1 (CR1), C Building, 2nd floor (IAEA Headquarters)

Conference Room 1 (CR1), C Building, 2nd floor

IAEA Headquarters

Poster AI Posters Session

Speaker

Chengshuo Shen (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

Description

It is a crucial challenge that disruption prediction should learn from limited data due to the considerable expense of obtaining an extensive experimental dataset in future tokamaks. To reduce the data requirements for future tokamaks, utilizing existing knowledge of disruption physics and tokamak discharge could be helpful. IDP-PGFE (Interpretable Disruption Predictor based on Physics-Guided Feature Extraction) exhibits commendable performance with a True Positive Rate (TPR) of approximately 90% and a False Positive Rate (FPR) of around 10% when handling a modest number of disruptive discharges, about 20 shots (alongside about 120 non-disruptive discharges) in J-TEXT. However, as the number of disruptive discharges decreases to about 10 shots, the data from a single tokamak becomes insufficient for training a satisfactory model, resulting in a TPR of about 75% and an FPR of approximately 15%. To overcome this limitation, we have adopted a domain adaptation algorithm called CORAL (CORrelation ALignment) for the disruption prediction task. Through the combined advantages of PGFE and CORAL, a cross-machine disruption prediction performance of TPR ~90% and FPR ~30% can be achieved when transferring knowledge from J-TEXT to EAST using only 10 disruptive discharges (and 100 non-disruptive discharges) from EAST. Consider the worst-case scenario, there could even be no data to access at tokamak's initial operation for future tokamaks. Therefore, for disruption prediction, it is crucial to establish a zero-shot disruption prediction model that exhibits both reliable and satisfactory performance. In recent years, computer vision (CV) and natural language processing (NLP) have achieved numerous zero-shot machine learning models, providing a wealth of experience that can be leveraged for disruption prediction. The input for CV tasks consists of pixel values, while NLP tasks involve tokenized words. Unlike NLP and CV tasks, disruption prediction tasks lack normalized feature inputs. Therefore, we aim to identify more widely applicable normalized input features for fracture prediction. At the same time, we aim to improve the data quality of the training data by incorporating more human input to realize a kind of zero-shot for disruption prediction.

Speaker's Affiliation International Joint Research Laboratory of Magnetic Confinement Fusion and Plasma Physics, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
Member State or IGO/NGO China

Primary authors

Chengshuo Shen (Huazhong University of Science and Technology) Wei Zheng (International Joint Research Laboratory of Magnetic Confinement Fusion and Plasma Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

Co-authors

Bingjia Xiao (Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) Dalong Chen (Institute of Plasma Physics, HFIPS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China) Fengming Xue (International Joint Research Laboratory of Magnetic Confinement Fusion and Plasma Physics, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) Nengchao Wang (Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) Xinkun Ai (International Joint Research Laboratory of Magnetic Confinement Fusion and Plasma Physics, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) Prof. Yonghua Ding (Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) Mr Yu Zhong (Huazhong University of Science and Technology) Prof. biao shen (Institute of Plasma Physics, HFIPS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China) bihao guo Prof. zhongyong chen (International Joint Research Laboratory of Magnetic Confinement Fusion and Plasma Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

Presentation materials