Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

17–22 Oct 2016
Kyoto International Conference Center
Japan timezone

Observations of residual bulk-fluid motion and low-mode areal-density asymmetries at peak convergence in NIF implosions through spectral measurements of DD and DT neutrons

20 Oct 2016, 14:40
20m
Kyoto International Conference Center

Kyoto International Conference Center

Takaragaike, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-0001 Japan
Oral IFE - Inertial Fusion Experiments and Theory Inertial Fusion Experiments & Theory

Speaker

Dr Johan Frenje (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Description

Hot-spot ignition planned at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) requires proper assembly of the DT fuel, as manifested by the evolution of areal density (ρR) symmetry and hot-spot ion temperature (Ti). Ideally, a spherically symmetric layer of cold and dense fuel with a ρR exceeding 1 g/cm2 surrounding a ~5 keV lower-density hot spot is obtained at peak convergence. To reach these conditions, the implosion must be 1D in nature and efficient conversion of the implosion kinetic energy to hot-spot thermal energy must be obtained. If substantial 3D non-uniformities in the implosion exist, the conversion efficiency is degraded and significant fraction of the implosion kinetic energy, in the form of bulk-fluid motion, remains at peak convergence. Experimentally, the residual bulk-fluid motion is assessed from directional measurements of the primary DT and DD neutron spectrum. The width of the primary spectrum is characteristic of Ti as well as the variance of the bulk-fluid motion in the burning region. Energy shifts beyond Ti-induced shifts are also an indication of bulk-fluid motion. Additionally, ρR asymmetries are determined from directional yield measurements of scattered neutrons or un-scattered neutrons. In recent high-foot-implosion experiments, directional measurements of the neutron spectrum illustrate the existence of substantial bulk-fluid motion and low-mode ρR asymmetries at peak convergence, which degrade the implosion performance. The measured DT-weighed apparent Ti is also consistently higher than the apparent DD-weighed Ti, a discrepancy that increases with increasing implosion drive. From a 1D perspective, the DD yields are also too high relative to DT yields. Effects due to profiles, reactivity differences, and bulk-fluid motion partly explain these observations, but none of them appear sufficient to explain the data. The observables are most likely caused by significant ρR asymmetries (>500 mg/cm2) and substantial bulk-fluid motion of about 50-100 km/s. The hypothesis is that these observations are driven by radiation drive asymmetry, and instabilities seeded by the fill tube and thin tent holding the capsule in the Hohlraum. These issues are currently being addressed by new engineering solutions, more refined implosion modeling, and implementation of new diagnostics. This work was supported by the US DOE (contract DE-AC52-07NA27344).
Country or International Organization U.S. A.
Paper Number IFE/1-3

Primary author

Dr Johan Frenje (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Co-authors

Dr Andrea Kritcher (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Andrew Mackinnon (SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory) Dr Brian Appelbe (Imperial College London) Dr Brian Spears (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Charles Cerjan (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Charles Yeamans (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Daniel Casey (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Daniel Sayre (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr David Bradley (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr David Munro (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Debra Callahan (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Denise Hinkel (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Edward Hartouni (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Essex Bond (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Gary Grim (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Jac Caggiano (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr James Knauer (Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester) Prof. Jeremy Chittenden (Imperial College London) Dr John Edwards (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Joseph Kilkenny (General Atomics) Dr Maria Gatu Johnson (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Dr Mark Eckart (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Nathan Meezan (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Omar Hurricane (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Otto Landen (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Paul Springer (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Prav Patel (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Richard Bionta (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Richard Petrasso (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Dr Robert Hatarik (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Sebastien LePape (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Tammy Ma (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Thomas Sangster (Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester) Dr Tilo Döppner (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Dr Tomas Murphy (Los Alamos National Laboratory) Dr Vladimir Glebov (Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester,) Dr Warren Hsing (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

Presentation materials