Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

15–19 Jul 2024
Metsätalo, University of Helsinki, Finland
Europe/Vienna timezone
The Decennial IAEA Technical Meeting on Atomic, Molecular and Plasma-Material Interaction Data for Fusion Science and Technology

Time-Dependent Plasma Surface Interaction Modeling to Address Dynamic Recycling in a Tungsten Divertor

18 Jul 2024, 14:00
25m
Hall 1 (Metsätalo, University of Helsinki, Finland)

Hall 1

Metsätalo, University of Helsinki, Finland

Unioninkatu 40 00170 Helsinki Finland

Speaker

Brian Wirth (University of Tennessee - Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

Description

Integrated modeling of plasma-surface interactions (PSI) provides a comprehensive and self-consistent description, moving the field closer to developing predictive and design capabilities for plasma facing components. This technique, using descriptions for the scrape-off-layer plasma provided by SOLPS, the sheath by hPIC, ion-surface interactions by F-TRIDYN and the sub-surface by Xolotl, has been successfully applied to interpret and predict steady-state PSI experiments in current and future tokamaks [1–4]. Here we describe further developments in our workflow to incorporate time-dependence and two-way information flow, to model transient scenarios (e.g., ELMs). We predict the evolution of W samples pre-damaged by He and exposed to ELMy H-mode plasmas in the DIII-D DiMES [5]. This presentation will describe two simulations to predict dynamic recycling. In the 1$^{\text{st}}$, we explore the effect of ELM frequency. Our simulations show that the plasma solution bifurcates, as the solution converges towards the intra-ELM equilibrium for short ELM cycles, and towards the inter-ELM for long ELM cycles. The plasma temperature increases with the inter-ELM duration, which leads to increases in impact energy (E$_{\text{in}}$) with the inter-ELM duration. For long ELM cycles, high impact energies and shallow impact angles (A$_{\text{in}}$) lead to reflection rates $\sim$1, which dominate D recycling. The high D recycling (rather than ELM cycling) in turn directly impacts the D content accumulated in the W samples. In the 2$^{\text{nd}}$, we explore code-coupling frequency, optimize the initial SOLPS solution and transport parameters, implement E$_{\text{in}}$ and A$_{\text{in}}$ values calculated by hPIC2, and improve the heat transfer description [6] in Xolotl. These simulations predict particle fluxes increase and heat fluxes decrease by 10-20% with the coupling time-step. A less shallow impact angle leads to smaller reflection rates and significant D implantation. The higher fraction of the implanted flux (and deeper), in particular during ELMs, increases the accumulated D content in the W near-surface region. Future expansion of the workflow includes coupling hPIC2 and GITR to ensure accurate prediction of Ein and Ain, and W impurity transport.

References
[1] A. Lasa et al, Nucl. Fusion 61 (2021) 116051
[2] A. Lasa et al., 28th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference (2020)
[3] A. Lasa et al., Phys. Scripta T171 (2020) 014041
[4] J.M. Canik et al., 27th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Gandhinagar, India, 2018
[5] G. Sinclair et al., 25th International Conference on Plasma Surface Interactions, Jeju, Korea (2022)
[6] J. Coburn et al., 64th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics, Spokane, WA, USA (2022)

This material is based upon work supported by the U. S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences and Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research through the Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) project on Plasma-Surface Interactions. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a DOE Office of Science User Facility operated under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231

Primary author

Ane Lasa (University of Tennessee)

Co-authors

J. S. Park (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) J. Lore (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) S. Blondel (University of Tennessee) D. E. Bernholdt (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) J. M. Canik (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) M. Cianciosa (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) J. Coburn (Sandia National Laboratories) D. Curreli (University of Illinois) W. Elwasif (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) Jerome Guterl (General Atomics) J. Hoffman (University of Illinois) J. M. Park (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) G. Sinclair (General Atomics) Brian Wirth (University of Tennessee - Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

Presentation materials