Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

7–10 Nov 2022
IAEA Headquarters
Europe/Vienna timezone
Programme has been announced. See side menu.

Radiative divertor compatible with RMP-driven, ELM-crash-suppression in fusion DEMO-type devices

10 Nov 2022, 09:50
20m
Board Room A (IAEA Headquarters)

Board Room A

IAEA Headquarters

Oral Radiative Power Exhaust Radiative Divertor

Speaker

Prof. Yongkyoon In (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology)

Description

The edge-localized-modes (ELMs) in magnetic fusion reactor raise a major concern not only due to the degraded core confinement, but also due to the adverse effects against plasma facing components [1]. In the existing medium size tokamaks, the application of resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) has proven effective in suppressing ELMs without being limited to ELM-crash-mitigation. Nonetheless, the RMP-driven, ELM-crash-suppression often elevates the peak of divertor heat flux at least by a factor of 2 or 3, in comparison with that of inter-ELMs without RMPs [2]. In that regard, the impurity seeding and deuterium gas puffing in the periphery of the plasma column had been expected to play a role in releasing the excessive energy in a radiative manner, which is essential to reach detached plasmas in divertor power exhaust handling.
However, whenever RMP-driven, ELM-crash-suppression becomes gradually radiative with either impurity seeding or gas puffing, it loses the high quality of ELM-crash-suppression. On the other hand, once high density, near-detached plasmas are accessed by RMPs, it has been nearly impossible, if not forbidden, to achieve the RMP-driven, ELM-crash-suppression at least based on the KSTAR experiments for more than a decade. Interestingly, in terms of ‘wetted area’, the strongly mitigated ELM-crashes in radiative divertor could be more favorable than the full ELM-crash-suppression [3]. For that reason, it is quite important to address whether radiative divertor, which is expected to be a routine in fusion reactor, would be compatible with RMP-driven, ELM-crash-suppression sooner rather than later. In recent KSTAR experiments, a series of promising results show that ITER-like 3-row RMP-driven, ELM-crash-suppression would be much better than 2-row counterparts in terms of the divertor thermal loading, while such 3-D configuration would be more amenable to radiative divertor [4]. At the same time, depending on the scrape-off-layer conditions, both RMP-driven, ELM-crash-suppression and detachment conditions vary significantly. Considering a preliminary K-DEMO design study shows an enormous challenge of power handling capability in divertor [5], a more comprehensive understanding of radiative divertor should be prioritized in reactor study, while its compatibility with ex-vessel RMP control needs to be addressed, if standard H-mode with ELMs remains a baseline scenario in fusion reactor.

References
[1] A. Loarte et al, Nucl. Fusion 54 033007 (2014)
[2] Y. In et al, Nucl. Fusion 59, 056009 (2019)
[3] Y. In et al, Nucl. Fusion 62, 066014 (2022)
[4] Y. In et al, Plenary talk at AAPPS-DPP (2021)
[5] S.J. Kwon et al, Fusion Engineering and Design 159, 111770 (2020)

Speaker's Affiliation Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan
Member State or IGO Korea, Republic of

Primary authors

Dr Hyungho Lee (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy) Prof. Yongkyoon In (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) Dr Sungjin Kwon (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy)

Presentation materials