Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

19–22 Jul 2022
ITER Headquarters
Europe/Vienna timezone
The TM programme is now accessible from the left-side menu

Strategy of disruption mitigation using multiple injection of shattered pellets in KSTAR

19 Jul 2022, 13:00
1h
Entrance Lobby (ITER Headquarters)

Entrance Lobby

ITER Headquarters

Contributed Poster Mitigation Posters

Speaker

Dr Jayhyun Kim (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy)

Description

ITER adopts massive particle injection using shattered pellet injection (SPI) as a basic mitigation method to mitigate three major risk factors that can occur in the process of plasma disruption: heat load, electro-magnetic load, and runaway electrons. The injected particles composed of a combination of hydrogen and neon increase the density of plasma through the assimilation process to prevent runaway electrons and emit stored energy in the form of radiant energy. A safe and effective disruption mitigation strategy in the ITER disruption mitigation system capable of injecting a total of 27 pellets depends on which combination of pellets are injected at what time. Among these strategies, the most basic issue is whether to sequentially or simultaneously inject hydrogen, which increases density, and neon, which emits energy. On the other hand, plasma dilution-cooled by hydrogen becomes plasma with completely different characteristics from typical tokamak plasma due to its high density and low temperature. The pellet assimilation in the dilution-cooled plasma and the radiation of stored energy may be different from those of typical tokamak plasma. However, experiments on dilution-cooled plasma have not been sufficiently conducted. KSTAR with two SPIs that form a symmetry in the toroidal direction can independently inject three different pellets for each SPI. KSTAR has conducted experiments to test the disruption mitigation strategy of ITER using multiple SPIs and diagnostics capable of diagnosing the plasma disruption process.

Speaker's title Mr
Speaker's email address jayhyunkim@kfe.re.kr
Speaker's Affiliation Korea Institute of Fusion Energy, Daejeon
Member State or IGO Korea, Republic of

Primary authors

Daisuke Shiraki (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) Mr Dongguen Lee (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) Jaewook Kim (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy) Dr Jayhyun Kim (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy) Mr Dongjae Kwak (Pohang University of Science and Technology) Gunsu YUN (Pohang University of Science and Technology) Jaungwon Yoo Juhyeok Jang (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy) Jun Gyo Bak (National Fusion Research Institute) June-Woo Juhn (Seoul National University) Mr Kunsu Lee (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy) Kwan Chul Lee (National Fusion Research Institute) Mr Kwangpyo Kim (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy) Larry Baylor (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) Michael Lehnen (ITER Organization) Nicholas Eidietis (General Atomics) Soohwan Park (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy) Prof. Young-cheol Ghim (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

Presentation materials