Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

19–22 Jul 2022
ITER Headquarters
Europe/Vienna timezone
The TM programme is now accessible from the left-side menu

Non-axisymmetric Radiation Modeling of JET SPI Discharges Using Emis3D

21 Jul 2022, 11:50
25m
Council Room (ITER Headquarters)

Council Room

ITER Headquarters

Contributed Oral Mitigation Mitigation

Speaker

Benjamin Stein-Lubrano (Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Description

Precise values for radiated power during tokamak disruptions are required to predict the effectiveness of mitigation techniques at preventing damage in net energy tokamaks like ITER and SPARC. Conventional approaches to calculating $ P_{rad} $ on JET assume a toroidally symmetric radiation source to allow fitting from foil bolometer arrays at two toroidal locations, which is otherwise an underdetermined problem. In mitigated disruptions, 3D MHD modes and localized impurity sources may break toroidal symmetry. To incorporate toroidally asymmetric structures in $ P_{rad} $ calculation, the Emis3D radiation modeling code introduced here adopts a physics motivated guess-and-check approach, comparing experimental bolometry data to synthetic data from absolutely calibrated candidate emissivity structures. Candidates are observed with the Cherab modeling framework [M. Carr et al. EPS 2017] and a best fit chosen using a reduced $ \chi^2 $ statistic. An uncertainty bar is derived by considering all models within two standard deviations of the best fit (the “uncertainty pool”), using bolometer channel errors of 10% of the maximum brightness at each timestep. The resulting uncertainty pool is sensitive to changes in the uncertainty quantification formalism, but the best fit is a robust finding. 2D tomographic inversions are tested, as well as helical structures and 3D MHD simulated distributions from the JOREK code [Huysmans et al. NF 47, 2007]. Two discharges in JET terminated by nominally identical pure neon shattered pellets carrying $2.46\times 10^{22}$ Ne atoms are analyzed using Emis3D (95709 and 95711). 2D tomographic inversions are built in 1ms intervals from the time of peak radiation through the current quench. These inversions are the best fit at these times, although helical distributions are within the uncertainty pool, introducing large lower error bars on $ P_{rad} $. Helical radiation structures are found to fit the pre-thermal quench (pre-TQ) best and exhibit a parallel flow towards the high-field side consistent with the magnetic nozzle effect and with JOREK simulations. Candidates from JOREK simulations are not found within the uncertainty pool, although this result is sensitive to the uncertainty quantification formalism. Improvements in the agreement between JOREK and the pre-TQ bolometry data were found by reducing the toroidal extent of the impurity source used in the simulation. On 95709 and 95711, radiated fractions of $f_{rad}= 0.95 +0.05/-0.31$ and $f_{rad}=0.98 +0.02/-0.26$, of the plasma stored energies 11.5 and 11.7 MJ respectively, are found, suggesting that the thermal and magnetic energy may have been fully mitigated in both discharges, in contrast with the standard weighted sum analysis that finds $f_{rad}=0.77$ and 0.90 respectively. However, both results are within the uncertainty margin, and $f_{rad}$ as low as $\sim65\%$ is possible for 95709. Time-dependent toroidal peaking factors will be presented.

Speaker's title Mr
Speaker's email address bsteinlu@mit.edu
Speaker's Affiliation Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts
Member State or IGO United States of America

Primary authors

Benjamin Stein-Lubrano (Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Ryan Sweeney (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Co-authors

Daniele Bonfiglio (Consorzio RFX, Padova, Italy) Mr Pedro Carvalho (Culham Center for Fusion Energy (CCFE)) Mr Jack Lovell (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) Larry Baylor (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) Robert Granetz (MIT) Stefan Jachmich (ITER Organization) Emmanuel Joffrin (CEA) Michael Lehnen (ITER Organization) Costanza Maggi (CCFE) Earl Marmar (Mass. Inst. of Technology) Eric Nardon (CEA) Umar Sheikh (SPC-EPFL) Daisuke Shiraki (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) Mr Scott Silburn (Culham Center for Fusion Energy (CCFE))

Presentation materials