Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

19–22 Jul 2022
ITER Headquarters
Europe/Vienna timezone
The TM programme is now accessible from the left-side menu

Mode lock precursors from the electron temperature profile in plasma termination on JET

20 Jul 2022, 11:15
40m
Council Room (ITER Headquarters)

Council Room

ITER Headquarters

Invited Oral Prediction and Avoidance Prediction & Avoidance

Speaker

Dr Gianluca Pucella (ENEA, Fusion and Nuclear Safety Department, C.R. Frascati, Italy)

Description

The capability to terminate plasma pulses safely is an important goal towards the optimization of operational scenarios in tokamaks, so it is of great importance to study the physical phenomena involved in plasma disruptions and to develop precursors for avoidance and/or mitigation actions. The development of tearing modes (TMs) inside the plasma is a major cause of disruptions. It has been shown that there are two main TM destabilization paths in plasma termination on JET, connected to the problem of impurity control: the core accumulation of high-Z impurities, leading to a temperature hollowing (TH) and to a broadening of the current density profile, and the influx of low-Z impurities, which are mainly radiating at the edge, leading to an edge cooling (EC) and to a shrinking of the current density profile. The formation of an “outboard radiating blob” due to high-Z impurities accumulated in the low-field side can also be responsible for EC.
Following the picture of TMs generated by changes in the current density profile, reflecting the changes in the electron temperature profile, two parameters have been defined from ECE radiometry to highlight the occurrence of TH and EC, and the possibility of identifying locked mode precursors based on the two parameters has been preliminary explored, by evaluating, for a large dataset of pulses, the characteristic time intervals between the increase of such parameters and the mode lock, which is widely adopted as disruption precursor to trigger mitigation actions. The obtained advances with respect to mode lock signal (1 s for TH, 100 ms for EC) are associated to the effective resistive diffusion time linking the changes in the electron temperature profile and the changes in the current density profile leading to large mode amplitudes. This is the reason why the real-time implementation of such parameters (as already done for a temperature hollowness indicator during the current ramp-up phase) would offer the capability of obtaining alerts before the mode onset, when stability analysis indicate a stable MHD scenario. In particular, the TH parameter could provide alerts useful to attempt to correct the termination, avoiding the disruption, whilst the EC parameter could provide alerts useful to anticipate mitigation actions.
Additional information are provided by the dynamics of mode lock signals. Mode saturation is quite general for EC in peaked electron temperature profile and the thermal quench (TQ) is usually induced by disruption mitigation valve (DMV) intervention, so it is not crucial to anticipate DMV. However, an explosive growth of the mode amplitude is sometimes observed for EC in hollow electron temperature profiles, leading in some cases to unmitigated TQ, so even a small advance in DMV intervention would be essential. A detailed analysis of this behaviour is planned in view of ITER, where the unmitigated disruption rate should be reduced as much as possible. The possibility of combining information on electron temperature and radiation profiles is also discussed, and examples from recent DT and isotopic experiments on JET are shown.

Speaker's title Mr
Speaker's email address gianluca.pucella@enea.it
Speaker's Affiliation ENEA, Fusion and Nuclear Safety Department, C.R. Frascati, Italy
Member State or IGO Italy

Primary author

Dr Gianluca Pucella (ENEA, Fusion and Nuclear Safety Department, C.R. Frascati, Italy)

Co-authors

Dr Edoardo Alessi (ISTP, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Milano, Italy) Dr Fulvio Auriemma (Consorzio RFX, Padova, Italy) Dr Matteo Baruzzo (ENEA, Fusion and Nuclear Safety Department, C.R. Frascati, Italy) Dr Daniele Brunetti (UKAEA, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, UK) Dr Paolo Buratti (Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”, Roma, Italy) Dr Clive Challis (UKAEA, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, UK) Dr Agata Czarnecka (Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, Warsaw, Poland) Dr Elena De la Luna (CIEMAT, Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión, Madrid, Spain) Dr Diogo Ferreira (IPFN/IST, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal) Dr Matteo Fontana (UKAEA, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, UK) Dr Domenico Frigione (Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”, Roma, Italy) Dr Luca Garzotti (UKAEA, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, UK) Dr Edmondo Giovannozzi (ENEA, Fusion and Nuclear Safety Department, C.R. Frascati, Italy) Dr Joerg Hobirk (Max Plance Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany) Dr Emmanuel Joffrin (CEA, IRFM, Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France) Dr Athina Kappatou (Max Plance Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany) Dr Ernesto Lerche (Laboratory for Plasma Physics, ERM/KMS, Brussels, Belgium) Dr Peter Lomas (UKAEA, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, UK) Dr Silvana Nowak (ISTP, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Milano, Italy) Dr Alessandro Pau (EPFL, Swiss Plasma Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland) Dr Lidia Piron (Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy) Dr Fernanda Rimini (UKAEA, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, UK) Dr Carlo Sozzi (ISTP, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Milano, Italy) Dr Dirk Van Eester (Laboratory for Plasma Physics, ERM/KMS, Brussels, Belgium)

Presentation materials