Since 18 of December 2019 uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

Nov 4 – 7, 2019
IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria
Europe/Vienna timezone
Meeting Material is now available and accessible from the left-menu

Assessing Alternative Divertors for DEMO – strategy and first results

Nov 6, 2019, 2:50 PM
Board Room C (C Building, 4th Floor) (IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria)

Board Room C (C Building, 4th Floor)

IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria

Oral (Plenary Session) Divertors for DEMO and Reactors DEMO Divertor Designs


Prof. Fulvio Militello (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy)


The uncertainties surrounding the physics of plasma exhaust and its centrality in reactor design require a thorough evaluation of promising exhaust configurations, so EUROfusion established a project to assess alternative divertors for reactor relevant devices and DEMO in particular. An alternative here is any divertor solution that cannot be qualified by ITER and it includes, but is not limited to, Double Null, Snowflake, Super-X and X divertors.
From 2019 the project has a revised strategy and it is delivering new systematic results, presented here for the first time. It focuses on a clear and quantitative evaluation of the potential benefits that alternatives might have with respect to conventional solutions as far as exhaust performances and core compatibility are concerned. These will be weighed against their unavoidable additional engineering complexity, which might rule out some solutions. Additionally, it will drive new ideas in the form of optimized, hybrid or novel solutions, noting the deadline to complete the assessments.
The approach is to deliver integrated results through a “main loop” where physics and engineering concepts are synergistically iterated and optimized. In parallel more refined techniques and new concepts are developed that will become part of the “main loop” when (or if) they reach maturity.
The results of the first iteration of the “main loop” show that all alternatives investigated (Double Null, Super-X, X-divertor and Snowflake divertor) could be generated with only external coils while respecting engineering force constraints on the poloidal field coils and central solenoid. New detailed structural calculations of stresses in the toroidal field coils show that some configurations are subject to much larger stresses. These are mostly caused by out of plane forces, possibly needing more rigid supports, so unconventional toroidal field coil designs may still be acceptable, although not all are equally efficient. Full 3D builds, including intercoil structures and port access for remote maintenance have been produced and their technical complexities will be discussed. For each configuration, vertical stability was also taken into account. On the physics side, multi-fluid scans of core and wall fueling and seeded argon concentration were performed to assess the detachment quality at an unprecedented level by comparing each design for an identical and large range of fueling and argon fluxes. The analysis is now performed with state of the art tools (SOLPS) to enable good understanding of complex effects and prepare for full kinetic simulations. Also, the resilience of the operating point to variations is systematically examined, leading to a full map of the plasma response to changes in fueling and seeding. Hence, detachment onset, depth, stability are obtained, rather than just the operating point. Also, pumping efficiency was assessed. As preliminary conclusions, snowflake configurations appear to be challenging from a structural and remote handling point of view. The other configurations do not present showstoppers, although more complex than the baseline single null design. The Super-X configuration seems to provide more heat flux mitigation benefits, but it might complicate the power handling at the inner target, still under investigation.

Country or International Organization United Kingdom

Primary author

Prof. Fulvio Militello (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy)


Dr Leena Aho-Mantila (VTT) Dr Roberto Ambrosino (Consorzio CREATE) Mr Thomas Body (IPP) Hugo Bufferand (CEA) Prof. Giuseppe Calabro (University of Tuscia) GUIDO CIRAOLO (CEA) Dr David Coster (MPG-IPP) Dr Giuseppe Di Gironimo (CREATE) Prof. Pierluigi Fanelli (Universita' della Tuscia) Dr Nicolas Fedorczak (CEA) Albrecht Herrmann (Max-Planck_Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany) Dr Paolo Innocente (Consorzio RFX) Richard Kembleton (EUROfusion, CCFE) Dr Tilmann Lunt (MPG-IPP) Dr Domenico Marzullo (CREATE) Mr Sam Merriman (UKAEA) Dr David Moulton (CCFE) Anders Henry Nielsen (Technical University of Denmark, Physics Department) Dr John Omotani (UKAEA) Dr Giuseppe Ramogida (ENEA) Holger Reimerdes (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas) Dr Michael Reinhart (EUROfusion) Paolo Ricci (CRPP-EPFL) Dr Fabio Riva (UKAEA) Andreas Stegmeir (Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics) Dr Fabio Subba (Politecnico di Torino) Wolfgang Suttrop (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Patrick Tamain (CEA) Dr Markus Teschke (MPG-IPP) Mr Alexander Thrysoe (DTU) Dr Wolfgang Treutter (MPG-IPP) Stylianos Varoutis (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) Dr Mirko Wensing (EPFL) Dr Marco Wischmeier (MPG-IPP) Dr Lingyan Xiang (CCFE)

Presentation materials