Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

3–6 Sept 2019
Shizuoka City, Japan
Europe/Vienna timezone
Meeting Material is now available and accessible from the left-menu

Characterization of Intermittent Fast Ion Transport in DIII-D

4 Sept 2019, 13:30
2h
Shizuoka City, Japan

Shizuoka City, Japan

Poster Transport of Energetic Particles Poster

Speaker

Kenneth Gage (University of California, Irvine)

Description

Fast ion loss detector (FILD) measurements indicate intermittent bursts of losses associated with Alfvén Eigenmode (AE) induced critical-gradient transport [1]. During the current ramp phase of a DIII-D inner wall limited, oval shaped, L-mode plasma with reversed-shear magnetic safety factor profile, the total AE activity increases with neutral beam injected (NBI) power. A mix of both frequency sweeping reversed-shear Alfvén eigenmodes (RSAEs) and near-constant frequency toroidicity induced Alfvén eigenmodes (TAEs) are also observed. As the beam power increases from 2.4 to 9.2 MW, the frequency and amplitude of fast-ion fluctuations increases, and a skewed tail emerges in the distribution of loss events. The addition of electron cyclotron heating changes the types of AEs present, increases the measured fast-ion density, and alters loss behavior [2]. New fluctuation measurements from an upgraded bank of FILD, fast-ion D-alpha, and imaging neutral particle analyzer diagnostics will be presented. In theory, intermittency is associated with the domino effect, where avalanches of global redistribution and losses can occur when many overlapping modes provide a channel for particle transport over a larger portion of phase space [3]. Quantification of intermittent transport is important for model validation, particularly for simplified critical gradient transport models that do not account for time dynamics. Furthermore, these experiments suggest that losses can be altered, or perhaps `smeared out' using active control to manipulate AE mode activity.

Work supported by U.S. Department of Energy under DE-FC02-04ER54698, DE-FG03-94ER54271, and DE-AC02-09CH11466.

[1] C.S. Collins, W.W. Heidbrink, M.E. Austin, et al., PRL 116, 095001 (2016)
[2] Collins et al., 44th EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, P1.101 (2017)
[3] H.L. Berk, B.N. Breizman, J. Fitzpatrick, H.V. Wong, NF 35 (1995)

Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Country or International Organization United States

Primary author

Kenneth Gage (University of California, Irvine)

Co-authors

William W. Heidbrink (University of California Irvine) Xiaodi Du (General Atomics) Cami Collins (General Atomics) Michael Van Zeeland (General Atomics)

Presentation materials