Speaker
Dr
Mark Boyer
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Description
Spherical torus based designs for fusion nuclear science facilities [1] and pilot plants [2] have little to no room for a central solenoid, and require the plasma current to be generated non-inductively. Recently completed upgrades to NSTX-U will enable the study of non-inductive scenarios, including start-up, ramp-up, and flattop current sustainment. This paper examines active control of such scenarios using TRANSP simulations. TRANSP is a time-dependent integrated modeling code for prediction and interpretive analysis of tokamak experimental data. Its predictive mode has been used for scenario development on NSTX-U, including fully non-inductive scenarios [3], and exploration of approaches to non-inductive ramp-up [4]. Recently, the ability to include feedback control algorithms in TRANSP has been developed [5]. The actuators considered for control in this work are the six neutral beam sources and the plasma boundary shape. The neutral beam sources allow the current drive deposition and heating to be tailored in real-time. The primary plasma boundary shape parameter that is considered is the mid-plane outer gap. Increasing this gap leads to increased bootstrap current and moves the neutral beam deposition off axis, tending to increase the central safety factor. To understand the response of the plasma current, stored energy, and central safety factor to these actuators and to enable systematic design of control algorithms, simulations were run in which the actuators were modulated and a linearized dynamic response model was generated. The simplified model was used to design several PID control laws using different combinations of actuators and measurements. Closed loop simulations show that modest changes in the outer gap and heating power can improve the response time of the system, reject perturbations, and track target values of the controlled values. Strong coupling between the controlled quantities is observed, making multi-variable control design an important next step.
Work supported by US Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC02-09CH11466.
[1] Y.K. M. Peng, et al, Plasma Phys. Control Fusion 47, B263 (2005).
[2] J.E. Menard et al., Nuclear Fusion 51, 094011 (2011).
[3] S. P. Gerhardt, et al., Nuclear Fusion 52, 083020 (2012).
[4] F. Poli, et al., Nuclear Fusion 55, 123011 (2015).
[5] M.D. Boyer et al., Nuclear Fusion 55, 053033 (2015).
| Country or International Organization | United States of America |
|---|---|
| Paper Number | EX/P4-43 |
Primary author
Dr
Mark Boyer
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Co-authors
Dr
David Gates
(PPPL)
Dr
Francesca Poli
(PPPL)
Dr
Jonathan Menard
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Dr
Robert Andre
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
Dr
Stefan Gerhardt
(Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory)
