Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

28–31 Oct 2025
IAEA Headquarters
Europe/Vienna timezone
The programme has been posted

First-Principles–Based Divertor Optimization: A Unified MCF Divertor Framework Applied to Wendelstein 7-X

28 Oct 2025, 12:05
20m
Press Room (M-Building) (IAEA Headquarters)

Press Room (M-Building)

IAEA Headquarters

Oral Divertors for Next-Generation Devices Divertors for Next-Generation Devices

Speaker

Dr Thierry Kremeyer (Max Planck Institut für Plasmaphysik)

Description

The stellarator’s steady-state capability offers inherent advantages for fusion power plants (FPP), including disruption-free operation and access to higher densities beyond the Greenwald density limit. However, reconciling particle exhaust and retention while fulfilling mandatory requirements of divertor life-time survival remains a critical challenge for reactor-relevant divertor operation in stellarators and other magnetic confinement fusion (MCF) devices.

At Wendelstein 7-X (W7-X), we employ a six- σ design methodology 1— a data-driven framework that optimizes processes by quantifying a priori performance metrics within six standard deviations (σ) of process yield — combined with the Kano model [2]. Following the principle of form follows function, we categorized divertor requirements into mandatory survival criteria (e.g., resistance to heat, sputtering, and mechanical stresses) and functional performance metrics (particle exhaust and retention). These performance metrics were further decomposed into eight a priori first principles. Statistical metrics derived for each principle enable quantitative assessment of the W7-X island divertor’s current performance, shown in the table below, and facilitate direct comparisons with existing and future divertor concepts.

W7-X divertor performance quantified based on a-priori first principles

A field-aligned, simple SOL density model is utilized, in which perpendicular transport processes are described by a single stochastic process with a uniform perpendicular diffusion coefficient. Based on the resulting normal distribution across common and private flux region, we present seven distinct target geometries applicable to any MCF device with diverted field lines. These designs employ distinct neutral-management strategies – prioritizing attached exhaust through the SOL or PFR, or re-ionization on the incident field line, the separatrix, or SOL density peak to drive volumetric ionization losses potentially leading to higher volume recombination ratios.

A rapid modelling cycle based on anisotropic SOL diffusion EMC3-Lite modelling [3], coupled with COMSOL [4], solving the neutral transport in the molecular flow regime via the angular coefficient method and the continuous flow regime via differential equations, was established to evaluate strike line positioning and quantify the 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 5th of the 8 a priori metrics. We benchmarked these metrics for W7-X’s current divertor geometry with the 5/5, 5/4, and 5/6 resonant magnetic island configurations, and outline ongoing efforts in the W7-X divertor concept development, including the design and assessment of new divertor geometries.

This principle-driven framework bridges stellarator-tokamak divides, offering unified divertor criteria for current and next-step MCF devices. By balancing reactor demands for particle control, retention and component longevity, it advances the path toward feasible FPPs.

1 YANG, Kai; BASEM, S.; EL-HAIK, Basem. Design for six sigma. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003.
[2] TONTINI, Gerson. Integrating the Kano model and QFD for designing new products. Total Quality Management, 2007, 18. Jg., Nr. 6, S. 599-612.
[3] FENG, Y., et al. Review of magnetic islands from the divertor perspective and a simplified heat transport model for the island divertor. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 2022, 64. Jg., Nr. 12, S. 125012.
[4] MULTIPHYSICS, COMSOL. Introduction to comsol multiphysics®. COMSOL Multiphysics, Burlington, MA, accessed Feb, 1998, 9. Jg., Nr. 2018, S. 32.

Speaker's title Mr
Speaker's Affiliation Max Planck IPP, Greifswald
Member State or IGO Germany

Author

Dr Thierry Kremeyer (Max Planck Institut für Plasmaphysik)

Co-authors

Mr Amit Kharwandikar (Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics) Antara Menzel-Barbara (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Arun Pandey (Max-Planck-Institute für Plasmaphysik, Greifswald) Chandra Prakash Dhard (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Greifswald) D. Boeyaert (University of Wisconsin-Madison) Joris Fellinger (Max-Planck-Institute für Plasmaphysik, Greifswald) Marcin Jakubowski (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Mr Markus Grasser (Max Planck IPP) Mr Michael Endler (Max Planck IPP) W7-X Team (Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Greifswald, Germany)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.