Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

3–6 Sept 2024
ITER Headquarters
Europe/Vienna timezone

Fluid and kinetic modeling of runaway electron seed generation during disruptions

5 Sept 2024, 17:05
25m
Council Room (ITER Headquarters)

Council Room

ITER Headquarters

Contributed Oral Consequences Consequences

Speaker

Ida Ekmark (Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden)

Description

Since the RE generation during tokamak disruption is exponentially sensitive to initial plasma current, highly energetic RE beams pose a critical challenge for future tokamaks. Accurate simulations of tokamak disruptions are therefore essential for the development of successful mitigation strategies and safe operation. However, when simulating such disruptions, fluid plasma models are often preferred due to their low numerical cost, even though they generally are less accurate than kinetic models.

We have compared simulations using both fluid and kinetic modeling of the RE seed generation for a diverse set of disruption cases in ITER and SPARC. The kinetic model is simplified by assuming that pitch angle scattering dominates the electron dynamics, enabling the distribution function to be analytically averaged over pitch angle. Furthermore, the distribution function has only been evolved for electrons within the mildly superthermal energy range, while ions, thermal electrons and REs are evolved as fluids. We have considered both non-activated and activated scenarios; for the latter we have derived and implemented kinetic sources for the Compton scattering and tritium beta decay RE generation mechanisms [1] in the simulation tool DREAM [2].

We find that fluid and kinetic disruption simulations of non-activated scenarios can have significantly different RE dynamics, due to an overestimation of the RE seed generation by the fluid model. The primary cause of this is that the fluid hot-tail generation model neglects superthermal electron transport losses during the thermal quench. In the activated scenarios the fluid and kinetic models give more similar predictions, which can be explained by the activated sources' significant influence on the RE dynamics and the seed.

[1] J.R. Martín-Solís et al., Nucl. Fusion. 57 066025 (2017).
[2] M. Hoppe et al., Comp. Phys. Comm. 268 108098 (2021).

Supported in part by Commonwealth Fusion Systems.

Speaker's title Ms
Speaker's email address ida.ekmark@chalmers.se
Speaker's Affiliation Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg
Member State or IGO Sweden

Primary author

Ida Ekmark (Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden)

Co-authors

Mathias Hoppe (Department of Electrical Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden) Tünde Fülöp (Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden) Roy Alexander Tinguely (Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA) Ryan Sweeney (Commonwealth Fusion Systems, Devens, MA, USA) Patrik Jansson (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden) Liam Antonsson (Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden) Oskar Vallhagen (Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden) Istvan Pusztai (Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden)

Presentation materials