Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

7–10 Nov 2022
IAEA Headquarters
Europe/Vienna timezone
Programme has been announced. See side menu.

Compact radiative divertor experiments at ASDEX Upgrade extrapolated to DEMO

10 Nov 2022, 11:10
20m
Board Room A (IAEA Headquarters)

Board Room A

IAEA Headquarters

Oral Radiative Power Exhaust Radiative Divertor

Speaker

Tilmann Lunt (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik)

Description

One of the most promising approaches to tackle the power exhaust problem in a divertor tokamak is the so called X-point radiator (XPR). By the controlled injection of impurities into the plasma a radiation cloud localized in the vicinity of the X-point is formed. It was shown that up to 95% of the power absorbed in the plasma can be dissipated before reaching the divertor targets [1]. Recent experiments [2], an analytic model [3] and numerical simulations with SOLPS-ITER [4] have shown that the temperature at the X-point under these conditions can become as low as a few eV,similar to the conditions in a detached divertor. We here report on experiments that demonstrate,that with an XPR long divertor legs and complicated divertor geometries may not be needed anymore. After establishing an XPR via nitrogen seeding in an H-mode with up to 15 MW of total heating power the X-point was moved towards the tungsten target surface such that the divertor legs become as short as 5 cm and the poloidal flux expansion as large as $f_x=ds_t/dr_u=50$. We also refer to this configuration as a `compact radiative divertor' (CRD). The energy confinement remained constant during the movement. The challenge of this configurations is that the (projected) field line incidence angle $\theta_\perp$ is inversely proportional to $f_x$ and therefore $\theta_\perp$ very small. Commonly it is assumed in the community that $\theta_\perp$ must be kept above $\sim2^\circ$ otherwise magnetic error fields or small misalignments of the divertor tiles could lead to strong toroidal asymmetries in the power deposition pattern or even to the formation of hot spots. At least with respect to the error fields it has recently been found in 3D transport simulations that the shallow angles might not be as problematic as assumed [5] when detachment can be guaranteed. The experiments presented here now confirm this finding: Despite of values for $\theta_\perp$ in the order of $0.2^\circ$ in the CRD configuration no hot spots were observed in the near-SOL region observed by the camera. Even with the X-point located exactly on the target surface and even without density or impurity feed-back control the discharge remained stable, hot spots absent and the divertor in a detached state. The maximized volume of the confined plasma, the smaller poloidal field coil currents and the increased vertical stability of the CRD are all very attractive properties for DEMO. In DEMO the XPR volume is of far higher relevance for power exhaust due to the enhanced ratio $a/\lambda_q$, compared to AUG. Further research will be devoted to the question on how to realize a pumping concept for He-ash removal and on how to access the high power CRD without passing a phase with harmful divertor conditions. At least at very high densities, an L-H transition with a detached CRD was observed indicating a possible path to this configuration without attaching the divertor.
[1] Bernert, NF 2020
[2] Cavedon, NF 2022
[3] Stroth, NF 2022
[4] Pan, to be submitted to NF 2022
[5] Lunt, Nucl.Mat.Energ. 2021

Speaker's Affiliation Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching bei München
Member State or IGO Germany

Primary author

Tilmann Lunt (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik)

Co-authors

Dr Albrecht Herrmann (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Mr Andreas Redl (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Dr Dirk Stieglitz (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Dr Dominik Brida (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Dr Guillermo Suarez (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Dr Marco Cavedon (Dipartimento di Fisica 'G. Occhialini', Università di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy) Dr Matthias Bernert (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Dr Michael Faitsch (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Dr Ou Pan (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik)

Presentation materials