Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

7–10 Nov 2022
IAEA Headquarters
Europe/Vienna timezone
Programme has been announced. See side menu.

The EU-DEMO Exhaust Modelling Roadmap – Numerical Implementation and Methods

7 Nov 2022, 09:30
30m
Board Room A (IAEA Headquarters)

Board Room A

IAEA Headquarters

Oral Divertors for DEMO and Next-Step Facilities DEMOs and Next Step Facilities

Speaker

Dr Sven Wiesen (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie-und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, 52425 Jülich, Germany)

Description

A simple extrapolation of the ITER Q=10 H-mode divertor target heat-load specification assuming mitigated type-I ELMs is not sufficient for the exhaust concept required in EU-DEMO provided the increased power level of Pedge = 300MW entering the edge region. The combination of an anticipated reduced power fall-off length of only a few mm in the SOL at a plasma current Ip=20MA whilst keeping the increase of the size of the device at a moderate level to optimize for cost of magnetic field (scaling with major radius, R_DEMO ~ 1.5 R_ITER) requires an integrated core-edge scenario with a tailored impurity mix inducing an energy dissipation fraction of up to 95% in the edge (of which 30% must occur in the confined region by line radiation). In recent experiments it has been demonstrated that at such high levels of radiation (e.g. located close or at the X-Point in single-null configurations) a transition into a small/no-ELM regime is observed coinciding with controllable strong detachment in the divertor. Modelling of an X-Point radiating regime and the validation of a suitable model is an ongoing task. Improved core physics scenarios for EU-DEMO (not necessarily employing an X-Point radiating regime) require upgrades for the pedestal transport model, or a lifting of other geometrical constraints. For example, the inclusion of a secondary X-Point in the upper-plane allowing strongly shaped plasmas at high beta may cause an additional source of impurities from wall erosion by energetic particles in remote areas and requires further numerical assessments with plasma-wall interaction codes.

The conceptual design phase for EU-DEMO implies a revision of the exhaust modelling roadmap until 2024. For the purpose of identifying a controllable exhaust scenario to be employed in EU-DEMO, the required physics foundation of candidate regimes must be re-assessed by using validated numerical tools. A new baseline reference exhaust model setup is currently being established in the DEMO central team (DCT) in Europe. This contribution summarizes the key aspects of the proposed complete SOLPS-ITER EU-DEMO physics model, including: fluid drifts and neutral kinetics, allowing for charge exchange for impurities enhancing non-coronal radiation levels in the edge. A multi-strand approach employed by the DCT with different levels of fidelity is presented, that seems advantageous to complement the final model to be composed for exploring the boundaries of the EU-DEMO exhaust operational window. Recently, new developments have started of an extension to the SOLPS-ITER code for automatic optimization of the DEMO divertor shape and a status of this work is presented. Finally, an outlook based on very recent activities on the development of fast exhaust models employing advanced machine learning will be given. Employment of such fast pre-trained models seem to be promising for fast integrated scoping studies through systems design codes and future plasma control schemes.

Speaker's Affiliation Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Germany
Member State or IGO Germany

Primary author

Dr Sven Wiesen (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie-und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, 52425 Jülich, Germany)

Co-authors

Leena Aho-Mantila (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland) Ryoko Osawa (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy,Abingdon,Oxon,OX14 3DB,UK) Fabio Subba (Politecnico di Torino) Sander Van den Kerkof (KU Leuven, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Celestijnenlaan 300, 3001 Leuven, Belgium) Simone Carusotti (Università degli Studi della Tuscia, School of Engineering, DEIM, 01100 Viterbo, Italy) Matthias Bernert (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Matti Coleman (United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority) Francesco Maviglia (EUROfusion, PPPT Department, Building R3 Boltzmannstr. 2 Garching 85748, Germany) Stefan Dasbach (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie-und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik, 52425 Jülich, Germany) Sebastijan Brezinsek (Forschungszentrum Jülich) Mattia Siccinio (EUROfusion Consortium) Hartmut Zohm (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik) Aaro Jaervinen (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, PO Box 1000, 02044 VTT, Finland) Adam Kit (University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland) Dmitry Matveev (Forschungszentrum Juelich) Yoeri Poels (Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands) Juri Romazanov (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH) Marco Wischmeier (IPP Garching)

Presentation materials