Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

20–23 Jul 2020
WebEx Meeting
Europe/Vienna timezone

Mitigation of runaway electron heat loads by deuterium SPI injection and kink activity

Not scheduled
25m
WebEx Meeting

WebEx Meeting

Invited Mitigation

Speaker

Cedric Reux (CEA, IRFM, F-13108 Saint Paul-lez-Durance, France.)

Description

Runaway electrons (RE) are a major threat for a reliable operation of future tokamaks including ITER. Avoiding or dissipating them is therefore essential. Shattered Pellet Injection (SPI) is the disruption mitigation and RE avoidance method currently planned for ITER [1]. However, if this first line of defence is not efficient enough to prevent the formation of REs, SPI must also be able to dissipate a fully formed RE beam. Recent experiments on JET [2] and DIII-D [3,4] using deuterium SPI showed complete dissipation of RE beams up to 1.2 MA. No measurable localized impact and damage on plasma facing components is observed in the JET cases. The runaway current is converted into ohmic current which then decays as a “standard” plasma current quench. Conversely, past experiments using Massive Gas Injection (MGI) or SPI had shown that beam mitigation using neon, argon or krypton was at best incomplete [5,6]. The RE current could be decreased in selected situations (low density companion plasma) but the final RE impact on the wall could not be avoided, leading to localized melting with currents as low as 200 kA [7].
The mechanisms leading to complete RE loss using deuterium SPI are twofold: a large MHD instability and a low-impurity content companion plasma. The companion plasma following D2 SPI is purged out of its remaining high-Z impurities, with electron temperature less than a few eV and electron density lower than $10^{18}$ m$^{-3}$. Current is allowed to grow again due to the voltage from the central solenoid, ultimately leading to a low-q MHD instability, most likely a kink [7]. MHD simulations with MARS-F and JOREK show that such a large amplitude kink leads to enhanced RE losses and increased wetted area. The reason why the instability is stronger with D2 SPI is not yet fully understood, but may be related to a more hollow RE current profile following the deuterium SPI. Such a profile can exhibit current-driven kink instability at any integer qedge.
Once the instability has dissipated the RE plateau, no magnetic energy is converted back to RE kinetic energy thanks to the low impurity content: the current quench is slow enough and its bound electron density low enough to prevent re-avalanching of RE. The conversion mechanism is much stronger in high-Z SPI mitigation cases compared to D2 SPI cases, thus explaining why high-Z runaway mitigation is incomplete.
These experiments and simulations show that D2 SPI is a promising RE mitigation mechanism for ITER in case a RE beam appears. Simulations are underway to quantify the degree of high-Z purging which is needed to achieve a sufficiently low conversion rate from magnetic to kinetic energy following the MHD instability.
Acknowledgments: This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium and has received funding from the Euratom research and training programme 2014-2018 and 2019-2020 under grant agreement No 633053. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission. Work supported by US DOE under DE-FC02-04ER54698 and DE-SC0020299.

Member State or International Organization France
Affiliation CEA, IRFM, F-13108 Saint-Paul-les-Durance, France

Primary authors

Cedric Reux (CEA, IRFM, F-13108 Saint Paul-lez-Durance, France.) Carlos Paz-Soldan (General Atomics) Eric M. Hollmann (University of California San Diego) Nicholas Eidietis (General Atomics) Michael Lehnen (ITER Organization) Stefan Jachmich (ITER Organization) Emmanuel Joffrin (CEA) Dr Peter Lomas (UKAEA/CCFE) Dr Fernanda Rimini (CCFE, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) Vinodh Kumar Bandaru (Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics, Garching) Larry R. Baylor (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) Dr Bykov Igor (University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0417, United States of America) Mr Luca Calacci (Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico 1, Roma, Italy) Federica Causa (ENEA C. R. Frascati) daniele carnevale (Universita' Roma Tor Vergata, Dipartimento di Ing. Civile ed Ing. Informatica) Dr Ivor Coffey (UKAEA/CCFE) Mr Douglas Craven (UKAEA/CCFE) Mr Andrea Dal Molin (University Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 3, 20126 Milano, Italy) Gianmaria De Tommasi (Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II) xiaodi du (General Atomics) Ondrej Ficker (Institute of Plasma Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences) Trey Gebhart (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) Sergei Gerasimov (CCFE) Dr Luca Giacomelli (Istituto per la Scienza e Tecnologia dei Plasmi, ISTP- CNR, via R. Cozzi 53, 20125 Milano, Italy) Jeffrey Herfindal (UsOakRidge) Matthias Hoelzl (Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics) Alexander Huber (Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institut für Energie- und Klimaforschung – Plasmaphysik) Dr Charlie Lasnier (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Yueqiang Liu (General Atomics, PO Box 85608, San Diego, CA 92186-5608, USA) Andrey Lvovskiy (Oak Ridge Associated Universities) Christopher Lowry (European Commission) Dr Eva Macusova (Institute of Plasma Physics of the CAS) Prof. Ana Manzanares (Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión, CIEMAT) Adam McLean (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) Massimo Nocente (Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano-Bicocca) Mr Enrico Panontin (University Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 3, 20126 Milano, Italy) Gabriella Pautasso Dr Alan Peacock (UKAEA/CCFE) Vladislav V Plyusnin (Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear, Associação EURATOM-IST, Instituto Superior Tecnico) D. L. Rudakov (University of California San Diego) Daisuke Shiraki (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) Dr Scott Silburn (UKAEA/CCFE) Dr Cristian Sommariva (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland) Carlo Sozzi (Istituto per la Scienza e Tecnologia dei Plasmi ISTP-CNR Milano Italy) Sundaresan Sridhar (IRFM-CEA Cadarache) Dr Ryan Sweeney (MIT PSFC) Dr Alex Tinguely (MIT PSFC)

Presentation materials