Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

28–31 Oct 2025
IAEA Headquarters
Europe/Vienna timezone
The programme has been posted

Core-edge integration studies in negative triangularity in TCV

28 Oct 2025, 16:40
1h 20m
Press Room (M-Building) (IAEA Headquarters)

Press Room (M-Building)

IAEA Headquarters

Poster Towards Integrated Scenarios for Exhaust Poster Session

Speaker

Olivier Février (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

Description

Negative Triangularity (NT) configurations exhibit higher energy confinement compared to the conventional Positive Triangularity (PT) configurations. Experiments on TCV [1] and DIII-D [2] have shown that NT L-Mode plasmas can achieve confinement comparable to H-mode, with $\beta_N$ up to 2.8 (2 in stationary state) demonstrated in TCV. This suggests the potential for high-confinement L-Mode reactors that circumvent H-mode challenges, including ELMs and power thresholds. In this contribution, we investigate power exhaust in Ohmic and high-power NT configurations to demonstrate the compatibility of NT plasmas with reactor relevant operation and core-edge integration.

In Ohmic L-Mode TCV discharges, detachment in NT configurations is challenging [3,4], with the outer target difficult to cool to electron temperature below 5 eV using core density ramps, compared to PT. Increasing the divertor closure with divertor gas baffles [5] decreases the outer target temperature, but detachment remains more difficult to achieve than in PT [6]. In Lower Single-Null (LSN), changing the upper triangularity (u) from positive to negative, whilst matching the divertor geometries, still results in harder detachment. This is, at least partially, explained by the role of the SOL width ($\lambda_q$), which is smaller in NT than in L-Mode PT [7,8], in agreement with theoretical and numerical predictions. These experiments with matched divertor geometries furthermore exhibit a typically lower divertor neutral pressure in NT than in PT, even with increased divertor closure [6]. Using extrinsic impurity seeding (N2), NT detachment was achieved, with reduced core confinement, and still exhibiting higher difficulty to detach as compared to PT.

These Ohmic studies have been extended to high-input power scenarios. The scenario is a 170kA LSN with favourable ion grad-B drift, with negative $\delta_u$ and positive $\delta_l$, to maintain compatibility with divertor baffles, employing Neutral Beam Heating (NBH). High performance is achieved, with $\beta_N$ up to 1.8 ($H_{98}$ near 1), at a Greenwald fraction of about 0.4, sustained in stationary conditions, for the duration of the NBH. Even without extrinsic impurity seeding, the divertor is relatively cold, as evidenced by the CIII front retreating from the outer target, a low outer target temperature (Te ~ 6 eV, measured by Langmuir probes) and a significant radiated power fraction. When $N_2$ seeding in the divertor is introduced, an X-Point Radiator forms. This, however, leads to reduced $\beta_N$. Real-time $\beta$-control can recover performance by increasing the NBH power, and enabled the demonstration of fully detached, high-performance ($\beta_N$ = 1.6) L-mode NT plasmas, comparable to ELMy H-mode, which suffers from reattachment during ELMs.

[1] CODA S., et al, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 64 (2022) 014004
[2] THOME K., et al, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 66 (2024) 206029
[3] FEVRIER O., et al, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 66 (2024) 065005
[4] TONELLO E., et al, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 66 (2024) 065006
[5] REIMERDES H., et al, Nucl. Fusion 61 (2021) 024002
[6] DURR-LEGOUPIL-NICOUD G., et al, in preparation (2025)
[7] MORGAN R., et al, submitted (2025)
[8] FAITSCH M., et al, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 60 (2018) 045010

Speaker's title Mr
Speaker's Affiliation Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), Lausanne
Member State or IGO Switzerland

Author

Olivier Février (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

Co-authors

Garance Durr-Legoupil-Nicoud (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), Lausanne, Switzerland) Mrs Cassandre Contré (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland) Riccardo Morgan (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), Lausanne, Switzerland) Dr Olivier Sauter (SPC-EPFL) C Theiler (Ecole Polytechnique F´ed´erale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), Lausanne, Switzerland) Benjamin Brown (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), Lausanne, Switzerland) Stefano Coda (CRPP-EPFL) Fabio Mombelli (Politecnico di Milano) Artur Perek (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), Lausanne, Switzerland) H Reimerdes (Ecole Polytechnique F´ed´erale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), Lausanne, Switzerland) Elena Tonello (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)) Dr Benjamin Vincent (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland) Martim Zurita (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Swiss Plasma Center, Lausanne, Switzerland) Mr Andrea Mastrogirolamo (Politecnico di Milano) Dr Matteo Passoni (Politecnico di Milano)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.