Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

28–31 Oct 2025
IAEA Headquarters
Europe/Vienna timezone
The programme has been posted

Divertor shaping as a continuum strategy to solving the power exhaust challenge

28 Oct 2025, 10:05
40m
Press Room (M-Building) (IAEA Headquarters)

Press Room (M-Building)

IAEA Headquarters

Oral Divertors for Next-Generation Devices Divertors for Next-Generation Devices

Speaker

Prof. Kevin Verhaegh (Eindhoven University of Technology)

Description

Fusion energy is accelerating through conventional (DEMO) and alternative compact reactor designs, that are potentially faster and cheaper to build (e.g., ARC, STEP). Power exhaust is a key challenge and a potential show-stopper for all these designs. Recent experiment show the key benefits of strongly shaped Alternative Divertor Configurations (ADCs) [1-4], demonstrating their potential as a power exhaust solution. Integration of ADCs in a reactor is complex: a compromise between power exhaust benefits and engineering feasibility is required [5]. Our experiments show that a continuum of ADC optimisation strategies exists: modest, yet strategic, divertor shaping can greatly enhance power exhaust performance [3] and control [4].

To study this continuum the Super-X, Conventional and an intermediate Elongated Divertor geometry (see figure [3]) were compared on MAST Upgrade. The Elongated Divertor has only half the total flux expansion increase of MAST-U’s Super-X divertor: lower than that of STEP [7] and comparable to that of SPARC [8], ARC [9] and the DEMO Super-X Divertor [6].

MAST-U Divertor geometries and power exhaust benefits

Crucially, the key benefits of the MAST-U Super-X Divertor over the Conventional Divertor are maintained in the moderately shaped Elongated Divertor.

  1. Target heat loads are reduced beyond geometric spreading expectations.
  2. The sensitivity of detachment is drastically reduced, improving real-time power exhaust control [4].
  3. Reducing the detachment onset without any adverse core impact increases the operational window of the detached regime. This improved core-edge compatibility can enable reactor operation at lower core power losses [6] and/or lower upstream densities/fuelling (relevant for ELM-free scenarios and fuel cycle limitations [7]) and/or lower impurity concentrations.

Studying the physics driving these ADC benefits provides lessons on both divertor design – relevant for reactors - and exhaust physics/simulations and control [4] – relevant for ITER. This shows synergies between neutral baffling, poloidal leg length and total flux expansion enable power exhaust benefits from strategic divertor shaping; consistent with reduced and full models. This demonstrates ADCs offer a continuum of solutions, from modest to advanced, enabling balancing engineering complexity and reactor power exhaust performance, that can be tuned to an individual reactor’s specification.

[1 ] K. Lee. PRL. 2025. C. Theiler, this meeting. [2] D. Moulton. NF, 2024. [3] K. Verhaegh. Comm. Phys. 2025. [4] B. Kool. Nat. Energy, 2025, in press. This meeting. [5] R. Kembleton. FED 2022. [6] Xiang. 2021, NF; [7] Henderson. NF 2025; [8] Kuang, et al. JPP 2020; [9] Wigram, NF, 2019.

Speaker's title Mr
Speaker's Affiliation Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven
Member State or IGO Netherlands, Kingdom of the

Authors

Prof. Kevin Verhaegh (Eindhoven University of Technology) James Harrison (United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority) David Moulton (CCFE) Christian Theiler (EPFL-SPC) Dominik Brida (Max-Planck-Institute for Plasma Physics) Bruce Lipschultz (University of York) Nicola Lonigro (UKAEA-CCFE/York Plasma Institute) Dr Nick Osborne (UKAEA) Lingyan Xiang (UK Atomic Energy Authority) Antti Hakola (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd.)

Co-authors

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.