Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

3–6 Sept 2024
ITER Headquarters
Europe/Vienna timezone

Advances in High Accuracy Physics-Based Tokamak Disruption Event Characterization and Forecasting Including Real-time Deployment

3 Sept 2024, 13:55
1h
Entrance Lobby (ITER Headquarters)

Entrance Lobby

ITER Headquarters

Contributed Poster Prediction and Avoidance Posters

Speaker

Steven Sabbagh (Columbia University)

Description

Disruption prediction and avoidance is critical to maintain steady plasma operation and to avoid damage to device components in ITER and reactor-scale tokamaks. Physics-based disruption event characterization and forecasting (DECAF) research determines the relation of events leading to disruption, and aims to provide event onset forecasts with high accuracy and sufficiently early warning to allow disruption avoidance [1]. The DECAF approach has been demonstrated to yield high accuracy disruption prediction and forecasting in both offline analysis and real-time application. A workflow has been established to reach next-steps: high accuracy under all plasma scenarios, and concurrent expansion of real-time deployment. The first real-time application of DECAF was made on the KSTAR superconducting tokamak including initial connection to control actuators. Dedicated plasma experiments focusing on disruptions caused by locking MHD instabilities were forecast with 100% accuracy. An MHD mode locking forecaster, using a torque balance model of the rotating mode, was implemented and utilized in real-time to produce these results. This forecaster was also used several times in these experiments to cue controlled plasma shutdown, trigger disruption mitigation using the KSTAR massive gas injection (MGI) system, and actuate electron cyclotron current drive and n = 1 rotating 3D fields for future disruption avoidance. New hardware and software for real-time (r/t) diagnostic acquisition and DECAF analysis continue to be installed and tested on KSTAR including high bandwidth (500 kHz) electron temperature, Te, profiles from electron cyclotron emission (ECE), and toroidal velocity profiles from a new r/t CES diagnostic with data taken in the 2023-24 run campaign. Several new r/t DECAF modules are being deployed on KSTAR, and first steps are being taken toward DECAF deployment on ITER. Research advances supporting these efforts include high bandwidth Te profile measurements being used to reconstruct ‘crash profiles’ to computationally identify sawteeth, ELMs, and other MHD as NTM triggers and as direct disruption precursors. Different DECAF disruption event chains are observed based on the plasma state at the time of the trigger event. Offline analysis has access to the full databases of many international tokamaks to best understand, validate, and extrapolate models. Fully automated analysis shows for datasets spanning entire run campaigns very high true positive rates, in some cases over 99%. A multi-device study conducted for plasma vertical instability used the DECAF workflow to produce real-time capable modelling with prediction accuracy of 99% -100%. An initial halo current model has been implemented to supplement criteria to determine the need of disruption mitigation.
Supported by US DOE Grants DE-SC0020415, DE-SC0021311, and DE-SC0018623.
U.S. and international patents pending.

References
[1] S.A. Sabbagh, et al., Phys. Plasmas 30, 032506 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133825

Speaker's title Mr
Speaker's email address sabbagh@pppl.gov
Speaker's Affiliation Columbia University / PPPL, New York, NY USA
Member State or IGO United States of America

Primary author

Steven Sabbagh (Columbia University)

Co-authors

Dr Guillermo Bustos-Ramirez (Columbia University) Mr Juan Riquezes (Columbia University) Mr Matthew Tobin (Columbia University) Dr Veronika Zamkovska (Columbia University) Mr Fredrick Sheehan (Columbia University) Mr Grant Tillinghast (Columbia University) Dr Joseph Jepson (Columbia University) Dr Hankyu Lee (Columbia University) Dr Jun-Gyo Bak (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy) Keith Erickson (PPPL) Christopher Ham (UKAEA-CCFE) James Harrison (United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority) Dr Jayhyun Kim (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy) Andrew Kirk (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy) Won-Ha Ko (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy (KFE)) Dr Lucy Kogan (United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority) Dr Jongha Lee (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy) Dr Jeongwon Lee (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy) Dr Kyu-dong Lee (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy) Dr Young-Seok Park (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy) Dr David Ryan (United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority) Andrew Thornton (United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority) Dr Jongsoo Yoo (PPPL) Dr Si-Woo Yoon (Korea Institute of Fusion Energy)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.