Since 18 of December 2019 uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

May 10 – 15, 2021
Virtual Event
Europe/Vienna timezone
The Conference will be held virtually from 10-15 May 2021

[OV POSTER TWIN] Overview of Recent Experimental results from the ADITYA-U Tokamak

May 10, 2021, 2:00 PM
4h 55m
Virtual Event

Virtual Event

Overview Poster Overview OV-OV/P Overview Posters


RAKESH TANNA (Institute for Plasma Research)


The ADITYA Upgrade (ADITYA-U) is a medium sized (R0 = 75 cm, a= 25 cm) tokamak having toroidal graphite limiter, configured to attain shaped-plasma operations with an open divertor in single and double-null configurations [1]. The foremost objective of ADITYA-U is to prepare the physics and the technological base for future larger tokamaks by expanding the ADITYA-U operating space and by performing dedicated experiments for validation of physics models. Since the 2018 IAEA-FEC Conference, ADITYA-U operations have been mainly devoted on realizing the plasma parameters close to the design parameters of circular plasmas in limiter configuration and also the initiation of shaped plasma operation. Emphasis has been given to novel experiments on runaway electrons (REs) and disruption control in the ADITYA-U [2]. Furthermore, experiments on radiative-improved modes using Ne, Ar gas injection, modulation of MHD modes [3] and edge turbulence using periodic fuel gas-puffs, density dependence of plasma toroidal rotation reversal [4], fuelling using SMBI etc.
For the typical discharges in ADITYA-U, in absence of any strong pre-ionization, the gas breakdown and successful plasma start-up is normally achieved with peak loop voltages of ~ 18 – 20 V (Electric field ~ 4.5 V/m). 42 GHz ECR [5] assisted low loop voltage (~10 – 12 V, Electric field ~2.1 V/m) start-up was successfully achieved with wave launched in fundamental O-mode from low field side. The toroidal magnetic field is ~ 1.4 T. Plasma discharges having plasma current ~ 170 kA, plasma duration ~ 330 ms, chord-averaged electron density ~ 2 – 6 x 10^19 m^-3 and central electron temperature ~ 300 – 500 eV has been achieved. The time evolution of typical high current, longer duration discharge of ADITYA-U is shown in Figure 1 and the overall progress of plasma current and duration enhancement during the year 2018-2019 are shown in Figure 2(a) and 2(b) respectively. Repeated cycles of vacuum vessel baking up to 135° C, followed by extensive wall conditioning using novel techniques [6] along with lithium coating [7] resulted in substantial reduction in partial pressures of various mass species and achievement of lower base vacuum of ~ 6 x 10^-9 Torr. Successful recovery of volt–sec along with adequate control of real-time horizontal plasma position and multiple gas puffing led to the achievement of longer discharge duration discharges in ADITYA-U.

Over the last two years, significant progresses have been achieved in ADITYA-U experimental research including, 42GHz ECR assisted low loop voltage start-up and heating experiments, electromagnetically driven pellet impurity injector for injecting micron size particles at high velocity (~220m/s) to understand disruption mitigation, wall conditioning by using different techniques of lithium coating, formation of runaway beam and its avoidance, Neon and Argon impurity injection for radiative improved modes, suppression of electrostatic fluctuations using hydrogen gas puff and its correlation with hard X-rays, effect of positive edge electrode biasing on drift tearing modes and runaway transport and effect of SMBI with edge safety factor (qedge), toroidal rotation reversal threshold studies etc. Dependence of current quench time (CQT) on qedge during disruptions and relation of CQT on the prevailing MHD activities prior to disruption has been studied in detail. Discharges with low qedge showed a high CQT compared to those observed at high qedge. Exploring the RE formation mechanisms, controlled RE generation experiments have been carried out by lowering the plasma density and adjusting the vertical magnetic field as shown in Figure 3 (#33061).

Fast visible imaging video camera, used for 2D tangential viewing, captured images which showed features of the RE beam formation with high spatial and temporal resolution as shown in Figure 4. This RE beam generation in controlled fashion is very useful in studying the mitigation techniques of REs using different techniques as the prevention of such RE beam is of a vital importance in future tokamaks, especially in the ITER, because of its potential danger to the plasma facing components.

In another significant RE experiment carried out in ADITYA-U, correlated suppression of RE loss, evident from hard X-rays intensity measurements, has been observed with suppression of edge electrostatic fluctuations in discharges where magnetic fluctuation amplitudes are not sufficient for affecting REs. Multiple periodic gas puff, which are used for plasma fuelling, suppresses the electrostatic fluctuations in the floating potential as well as the density fluctuations (measured with Langmuir probes) in the edge region. Figure 5 shows the suppression of edge turbulence due to gas puff. This is also observed clearly in the spectrogram of density fluctuations. The hard X-rays flux is also seen to be highly correlated with the edge turbulence. The decrease in edge turbulence is accompanied by a decrease in HXR flux. This observation of correlated effect of electrostatic fluctuation on RE transport throws light on new mechanism of RE loss and may be exploited to design novel RE mitigation methods.

In another interesting experiment, the REs are confined by applying a voltage to an electrode placed at the edge region of the plasma prior to the disruption. Figure 6 shows the multiple pulses of biasing applied to an electrode placed ~ 2.5 cm inside the LCFS for the shot #33336. The last pulse of biasing coincides with the plasma disruption as shown in Figure 7, describes that in presence of biasing during the disruption, the HXR intensity as well as HXR flux persists for ~10 ms even after the termination of the plasma current. A possible mechanism of confinement is the Er x BΦ motion of REs after the disruption, where the Er is generated by electrode biasing.

For the first time, ADITYA-U has experimentally demonstrated the use of electromagnetically driven payloads for particle injection into the tokamak plasmas for disruption mitigation studies. The impurity particles reached the core of the plasma within ~ 1.25 ms and causes fast termination of plasma current and radiate the whole plasma energy in ~ < 2 ms. Furthermore, the preliminary experiments related to plasma shaping by charging the divertor coils during plasma current plateau, confinement improvement with ion cyclotron resonance (ICRH) assisted auxiliary heating and deuterium injection is undergoing and the results of the same will be presented. This paper summarizes the experimental research of ADITYA-U tokamak in the key areas of thermo-nuclear fusion over the last two years.


[1] Tanna R. et al 2018 Plasma production and preliminary results from the ADITYA Upgrade tokamak Plasma Sci. Technol. 20 074002.
[2] Tanna R. et al 2019 Overview of operation and experiments in the ADITYA-U tokamak Nucl. Fusion 59 112006.
[3] Raj Harshita et al 2020 Effect of periodic gas-puff on drift-tearing modes in ADITYA/ADITYA-U tokamak discharges Nucl. Fusion 60 036012.
[4] Shukla G. et al 2019 Observations of toroidal plasma rotation reversal in the ADITYA-U tokamak Nucl. Fusion 59 106049.
[5] Shukla B.K. et al 2019 Commissioning of Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating (ECRH) system on tokamak ADITYA-U Fusion Eng. Des. 146 2083 – 86.
[6] Jadeja K.A. et al 2019 Novel approach of pulsed-glow discharge wall conditioning in the ADITYA Upgrade tokamak Nucl. Fusion 59 086005.
[7] Jadeja K.A. et al Lithium Wall Conditioning Techniques in ADITYA-U Tokamak for Impurity and Fuel Control (In this conference).

Affiliation Institute for Plasma Research, Bhat, Gandhinagar, India.
Country or International Organization India

Primary author

RAKESH TANNA (Institute for Plasma Research)


Joydeep Ghosh (Institute for Plasma Research) ROHIT KUMAR (Institute For Plasma Research) Tanmay Macwan (Institute for Plasma Research) Harshita Raj (Institute for Plasma Research) Suman Aich (Institute for Plasma Research) Kumarpalsinh Jadeja (Institute for plasma Research) Kaushal Patel (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr Kaushlender Singh (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr Suman Dolui (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr Dinesh Varia (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr Devraj Sadharakiya (Institute for Plasma Research) Braj Kishore Shukla (Institute for Plasma Research) Prof. P.K. Chattopadhyay (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr M.N. Makwana (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr Kunal S. Shah (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr Shivam Gupta (Institute for Plasma Research) Dr Balakrishnan V. Nair (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr Chet Narayan Gupta (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr Vipul K. Panchal (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr Praveenlal Edappala (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr Bharat Arambhadiya (Institute for Plasma Research) Mrs Minsha Shah (Institute for Plasma Research) Mrs Pramila Gautam (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr Raulji Raulji (Institute for Plasma Research) Mrs Praveena Kumari Shukla (Institute for Plasma Research) Rachana Rajpal (Institute for Plasma Research) Nandini Yadava (Gujarat University) Sharvil Patel (Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University) Mrs Nilam Ramaiya (Institute for Plasma Research) Malay Bikas Chowdhuri (Institute for Plasma Research) RANJANA MANCHANDA (INSTITUTE FOR PLASMA RESEARCH) Ritu Dey (Institute for Plasma Research) Gaurav Shukla (Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University) KAJAL SHAH (PANDIT DEENDAYAL PETROLEUM UNIVERSITY) Nirmal Kumar Bisai (Institute for Plasma Research, Bhat, Gandhinagar-382428, India) Dr P.K. Atrey (Institute for Plasma Research) Dr Surya Kumar Pathak (Institute for Plasma Research) Umesh Kumar Nagora (Institute for Plasma Research) Kiran PATEL (Institute for Plasma Research) Mrs Varsha Siju (Institute for Plasma Research) Jayesh Raval (Institute for Plasma Research (IPR), Bhat, Gandhinagar, India) Shishir Purohit (IPR) Manoj Kumar (Institute for Plasma Research) Kumudni Tahiliani (Institute for Plasma Research, India) Devilal Kumawat (Institute for plasma Research Bhat Gandhinagar) Mr Sameer Kumar Jha (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr Gopalakrishana M. V. (Institute for Plasma Research) Mr DANIEL RAJU (Institute for Plasma Research) Yogesh Saxena (Institute for Plasma Research, INDIA) Prof. Abhijit Sen (Institute for Plasma Research) Prof. Rabindranath Pal (Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata, India.) Dr Shashank Chaturvedi (Institute for Plasma Research)

Presentation materials