Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.
10-15 May 2021
Virtual Event
Europe/Vienna timezone
The Conference will be held virtually from 10-15 May 2021

Helium ash removal in DEMO-FNS

11 May 2021, 08:30
4h
Virtual Event

Virtual Event

Regular Poster Magnetic Fusion Theory and Modelling P1 Posters 1

Speaker

Alexey Dnestrovskiy (NRC Kurchatov Institute)

Description

In this paper the integrated modelling for the steady-state regime of a fusion neutron source DEMO-FNS (R/a=3.2m/1m, B=5T, Ip=4-5MA) [1] is complemented by the helium balance in the divertor and core plasma. The model describes the power and particle balances consistently in the divertor and core plasmas according to approach [2] and finds the condition to fulfill the global requirements on: neutron source value Sneut >1019/s, maximal peaking heat load is limited by qpk <10MW/m2, keeping up-down symmetry and avoidance of deep detachment, μ<1, condition for plasma current overdrive Ipl ≤ IBS+ICD , when the plasma current Ipl is generated by the noninductive methods from neutral beam ICD and from the bootstrap current IBS and on a source by pellets Spel>fT/(1-fT)SNB, that control the tritium fraction fT =nT/(nT+nD) in a core, where SNB is the D source from neutral beam, Spel is the pellet source of D and T.
The energy and particle balances in the core plasma are modelled with transport equations in the ASTRA code [3] using ITER IPB(y, 2) [4] with prescribed H-factor, ratio of main ions and helium confinement times to the energy confinement time τp/τE, τНе/τE , tritium fraction, fT, electron averaged density <ne> (maintained by the pellet source Spel) and density at the pedestal (see Table 1). Model for the pedestal poloidal beta and the pedestal width is taken from [5,6].
The state of divertor plasma is determined by the values of the incoming heat flux PSOL, the neutral pressure in divertor volume pn, the concentration of the neon impurity CNe and the pumping speed Cpump to pump out the helium ash produced by the fusion reaction (see Table 2). Results of SOLPS4.3 [7] series runs are approximated by analytical dependencies (scalings) in order to install the boundary conditions and heat and particle fluxes through the separatrix into the core plasma.
Acceptable window (hatched) for steady state DEMO-FNS regime in a plane of the neutral pressure pn and neon relative density at the separatrix CNe. Limits (solid lines) are shown for the peak power load on the divertor targets qpk = 10MW/m2 (black), up–down symmetry condition for the divertor plasma μ = 1 (red), minimal tritium pellet source Spel =SNB for fT=0.5 (green) and plasma current overdrive condition IPL<IBS+ICD (blue). Operating point is shown by star (see Tables 1-3)

Self-consistent modeling of central and divertor plasma for DEMO-FNS [8] allows to determine the acceptable window of the divertor parameters pn and CNe where the global requirements are fulfilled (see Figure). It should be noted that in comparison to the modelling without helium balance [1] the acceptable parameter window become significantly constricted. The neutron yield is weakly reduced but remained to be at the reasonable level Sneut= 1.1·1019/s. As one of the neutron reduction factor is the decrease of the tritium fraction in the core plasma in order to fulfill the requirement to tritium fraction control with pellet source (see Table 3). The up-down symmetry requirement (μ<1 red line in Figure) become a strong factor in the divertor neutral pressure pn limit. We need to make an accurate investigation of a single X-point configuration as it can be more efficient to mitigate the power load to divertor plates.
References
[1] A.Yu. Dnestrovskiy et al., Nuclear Fusion 2019 59 (9) 096053
[2] H. D. Pacher, et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 313 (2003) 657
[3] G.V. Pereverzev and P.N. Yushmanov, IPP-Report IPP 5/98 (2002),
[4] ITER Physics Expert Group on Confinement and Transport, 1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 2175
[5] P. B. Snyder et al. Nucl. Fusion, 2011, vol. 51, p. 103016
[6] S.Yu. Medvedev., et al., 2012 Probl. At. Sci. Technol. Ser. Thermonucl. Fusion 35 21 (in Russian)
[7] A.S. Kukushkin, et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 86 (2011) 2954
[8] Yu.S. Shpanskiy and DEMO-FNS Team 2019 Nucl. Fusion 59 076014

Table 1 Set of core plasma parameters
τp/τE, τНе/τE 4
Н-factor 1.3
fT 0.5
Ipl, MA 4.5
nped/<ne> 0.7
<ne> 1019/m3 7

Table 2 Set of divertor plasma parameters
PSOL, MW 37.5
pn, Pa 2
Cpump, m3/s 20
СNe=ΣNNe/ne 0.025
qpk, MW/m2 9.7
μ 0.87

Table 3 Result global values
Sneut 1019/с 1.1
IBS, MA 1.7
ICD, MA 2.8
PDT МW 31
PDT_pp /PDT_bp 1.8
SpelT,1019/s 58
SpelD,1019/s 21

Country or International Organization Russia
Affiliation National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute"

Primary author

Alexey Dnestrovskiy (NRC Kurchatov Institute)

Co-authors

Andrei Kukushkin (NRC Kurchatov Institute) Boris Kuteev (NRC Kurchatov Institute) Vladimir Sergeev (Saint-Petersburg State Polytechnical University)

Presentation Materials