Since 18 of December 2019 conferences.iaea.org uses Nucleus credentials. Visit our help pages for information on how to Register and Sign-in using Nucleus.

# 28th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference (FEC 2020)

10-15 May 2021
Virtual Event
Europe/Vienna timezone
The Conference will be held virtually from 10-15 May 2021

## Performance Integration of High Temperature Plasmas in the LHD deuterium operation

14 May 2021, 14:51
17m
Virtual Event

#### Virtual Event

Regular Oral Magnetic Fusion Experiments

### Speaker

Hiromi Takahashi (National Institute for Fusion Science)

### Description

Simultaneous high ion temperature ($T_i$) and high electron temperature ($T_e$) regime has been significantly extended due to the optimized heating scenario in the LHD deuterium (D) campaign. Such high-temperature plasmas were realized by the simultaneous formation of an electron ITB (e-ITB) and an ion ITB (i-ITB) by the combination of high power NBI and ECRH. In the high $T_i$ operation the EIC (Energetic ion driven interchange) modes, which causes the $T_i$ degradation, was clearly suppressed due to the ECRH superposition. Furthermore, the e-ITB was successfully formed without degradation of the ion thermal confinement for the high $T_i$ plasmas. This is due to the $T_{e0}$/$T_{i0}$ maintaining the moderate value of 0.66. Consequently, $T_{e0}$ could be increased up to 6.6 keV with the $T_{i0}$ ~10 keV (previous achievement at FEC2018 was $T_{i0}$ = 10 keV and $T_{e0}$ = 3.6 keV [1]).

In future reactors, the fusion reaction is expected to be sustained under the electron heating dominant condition, where both $T_i$ and $T_e$ are high. Thus not only the investigation of the confinement improvement but also the characterization of the thermal transport for the plasmas, of which $T_i$ and $T_e$ are simultaneously high, are necessary. In the present status, such a plasma condition is realized by the combination heating of a NBI and an ECRH. The effect of a $T_e$/$T_i$ and/or an ECRH on the ion thermal confinement has been studied in several devices. In recent years, an integration of high $T_i$ and high $T_e$ with the simultaneous formation of an i-ITB and an e-ITB has been achieved in the LHD [2]. The paper shows the successful extension of simultaneous high $T_i$ and high $T_e$ regime in the LHD deuterium operation due to the suppression of the EIC modes and control of the $T_e$/$T_i$ value.
The EIC is triggered by helically trapped ions at lower order magnetic resonant surface of $m/n$ = 1/1. The EIC causes loss of high energy ions both in the plasma core and the edge, leading to the decrease in $T_i$ [3]. Thus the mitigation of the EIC is a key for realizing higher $T_i$. Figure 1 shows the comparison of the time evolution of (a) the heating power, (b) the line-averaged-electron density $n_{e-fir}$, (c) the poloidal magnetic fluctuation amplitude $b_\theta$, (d) the neutron emission rate $S_n$, (e) the $T_{e0}$, and (f) the $T_{i0}$ without and with 2.5-MW ECRH superposition. The NBI power was similar (~25 MW) and the operated magnetic configuration was same as $R_{ax}$ = 3.58 m and $B_t$ = 2.87 T. The C pellet was injected at 4.57 s to control the impurity and to increase the S/N of CXS measurement. The bursty increase of $b_\theta$ and the synchronized drop in the $S_n$ correspond to the EIC occurrence and the loss of the high energy ions, respectively. Due to the ECRH superposition the EIC event was clearly suppressed. Consequently, the $S_n$, which is reflected the amount of the confined high energy ions, increased and this contributed to realizing the higher $T_{i0}$. Note that the $b_\theta$ increase at $t$ = 5.1 s was due to the NBI breakdown.
Although the ECRH is effective to mitigate the EIC, the increase in $T_e$/$T_i$ causes the destabilization of the ITG mode [4], leading to the degradation of the ion thermal confinement. Figure 2 shows the dependence of the normalized scale length of $T_i$ on the $T_e$/$T_i$ at the effective minor radius of $r_{eff}$ = 0.1 m. These data were obtained in the high $T_i$ operation with the superposed on-axis ECRH power from 0 to 5.4 MW. The significant degradation of the $R/L_{Ti}$ was observed both in the H and D plasmas when the $T_e$/$T_i$ exceeded ~0.7. These results show that not only the mitigation of EIC by ECRH but the control of $T_e$/$T_i$ in the moderate range is important for realizing high $T_i$ and high $T_e$ simultaneously.
Presently we could successfully obtain the high $T_i$ plasma (10 keV) with the increased $T_{e0}$ up to 6.6 keV by the on-axis ECRH with 1.8 MW (1/3 of the LHD-ECRH full power). The $T_{e0}$/$T_{i0}$ was 0.66, which value was slightly lower than the threshold of $R/L_{Ti}$ degradation shown in Fig. 2, and the EIC was also mitigated in the discharge. Figure 3 shows the radial profile comparison of (a) $T_e$, (b) the electron thermal diffusivity $\chi$$_e, (c) T_i, and (d) the ion thermal diffusivity \chi$$_i$ between the high $T_i$ plasmas without and with 1.8-MW ECRH. The NBI power was similar (~30 MW) and the operated magnetic configuration was same as $R_{ax}$ = 3.6 m and $B_t$ = 2.85 T. The plasma W/O ECRH was obtained before FEC2018. The EIC events and the accompanying loss of the high energy ions were observed during the discharge W/O ECRH. Applying the on-axis ECRH superposition, $T_e$ gradient increased and the $\chi$$_e decreased especially in r_{eff} < 0.2 m due to the e-ITB formation. For the ion, the reduction in the \chi$$_i$ was observed around the plasma half radius associated with the EIC suppression and the peaked profile was maintained in the plasma central region with the $T_{i0}$ of 10 keV.
Figure 4 is the summary of the extension of the high temperature operational area in the LHD. The simultaneous high $T_i$ and high $T_e$ regime was significantly extended from previous IAEA FEC. In the LHD deuterium experiment, we have attained the $T_i$ of 10 keV due to the better confinement accompanied with the stronger i-ITB compared with hydrogen plasmas [1, 5]. Present results of the extension of the high temperature regime reinforce the feasibility of the helical reactor and enable us to investigate the plasma confinement property close to ignition temperature condition.

[1] H. Takahashi et al., Nucl. Fusion 58 106028 (2018).
[2] H. Takahashi et al., Nucl. Fusion 57 086029 (2017).
[3] K. Ogawa et al., Nucl. Fusion 58 044001 (2018).
[4] M. Nakata et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58 074008 (2016).
[5] T. Kobayashi et al., Sci. Rep. 9 15913 (2019).

Country or International Organization Japan National Institute for Fusion Science

### Primary author

Hiromi Takahashi (National Institute for Fusion Science)

### Co-authors

Kiyofumi Mukai (National Institute for Fusion Science) Tatsuya Kobayashi (National Institute for Fusion Science) Sadayoshi Murakami (Departement Nuclear Engineering, Kyoto University) Dr Haruhisa Nakano (National Institute for Fusion Science) Kenichi Nagaoka (National Institute for Fusion Science) Satoshi Ohdachi (National Institute for Fusion Science) Mikirou Yoshinuma (National Institute for Fusion Science) Katsumi Ida (National Institute for Fusion Science) Ryohma Yanai (National Institute for Fusion Science) Yasuo Yoshimura (National Institute for Fusion Science) Toru Tsujimura (National Institute for Fusion Science) Kenji Tanaka (National Institute for Fusion Science) Motoki Nakata (National Institute for Fusion Science) Hiroyuki Yamaguchi (National Institute for Fusion Science, National Institutes of Natural Science) RYOSUKE SEKI (National Institute for Fusion Science) Prof. Masayuki Yokoyama (National Institute for Fusion Science) Tetsutarou Oishi (National Institute for Fusion Science) Dr Yasuko Kawamoto (NIFS) Motoshi Goto (National Institute for Fusion Science) Tetsuo Seki (National Institute for Fusion Science) Dr Kenji Saito (National Institute for fusion science) Hiroshi Kasahara (National Institute for Fusion Science) Dr Shuji Kamio (National Institute for Fusion Science) Yasuhiro Suzuki (National Institute for Fusion Science) Dr Ryuichi Sakamoto (National Institute for Fusion Science) Gen Motojima (National Institute for Fusion Science) Dr Ichihiro Yamada (NIFS) Dr Ryo Yasuhara (NIFS) Dr Hisamichi Funaba (NIFS) Kunihiro Ogawa (National Institute for Fusion Science) Mitsutaka Isobe (National Institute for Fusion Science) Tokihiko Tokuzawa (National Institute for Fusion Science) Akira Ejiri (Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo) Prof. Masaki Osakabe (NIFS) Tomohiro Morisaki (National Institute for Fusion Science) Yasuhiko Takeiri (National Institute for Fusion Science) the LHD experiment group (National Institute for Fusion Science)

### Presentation Materials

 IAEA2020_presentation_HTakahashi_v2.pdf Summary_slide_HTakahashi_id781.pdf Summary_slide_HTakahashi_id781.pptx